Re: [iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FE61208AF for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9uSbNFyB5pXY for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7187F120867 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o15so13170698ljg.6 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6hq7Boe2WcI9Ra+QPabtWDksitZS4ap0wjftfYUIQm8=; b=MIPq2rfhGCZCQKdi3U/jlMN2rqT0eU0POgEvztcOxVSQV/5go1OSWAZx8S/xRgNCVN bsI5Iz4yXs1umMMq/B7PfMCGzXZdoigsaH+YfsHa63IC/9zH+BXFJ7VVWpoL/QfMc8+m 2XIEV6khOqyoGcoGtEU4dKLZS4gP4CJdsziMR5KltkOmtA/FPZryOzAFQIJZNLOr4IuO g6Yq95V9moxAtXpNmzSu7Pv6xAFwwd69na4MZQ15y57Hz2WZ9epOPEeeh2zDAxl3NSdq 8J8ijFlgDc2BpirJxT2sM4goia12gPpLE2+f3OoXqFm16w2x+QRs8HlWe0M8k1PjF5nS AHTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6hq7Boe2WcI9Ra+QPabtWDksitZS4ap0wjftfYUIQm8=; b=MPQZRrNT6M8LOkSjN9XowWRJGxASCiXhNFCq+VIXhv+YdzmsR4xKN3ac7JXsdRnEPT 3HMGCxNxLvD5E6eE8kXQ3MOMfQj+xgsfvn9bk6tiHP8+oYNdbtvpUrMw0SNr0IkhYKU3 6iZ2qd6gagt80EznIJFCerr4B+8HYe7CUuWo9GOLYPPNuq43mpaU0KGVam5D+36WFUtb Bd7QYvXHAQBjse22LzM4W7ztaKbn79atD1IbI4qbGZeTyOLcY70IUnRAmekX+8MApwcs VKRltyfTyVzrHvERB929WNKR58trKMEW1stqY8lzgLfz+st7e84rF+1OHg8YpJsltxZu UPZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUMWszRxdXDbuzaUGsErKtZvBNXiqRKsIak+orv1hd7Mw4n2vb1 ecoegyNyVNVz5SymnH/9YHdI7ZcUCzwtvTpnbXU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylb6Fcbes6xSY+sjYAB0EscNl0FdfAkLCDW1qLgSMGHNsauW31CLawOc9la9JR0ywiUkykDORicYQN/+tN8cU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:94c8:: with SMTP id r8mr5522433ljh.28.1581453783608; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpbDccBj3JKjPLjehgMcR=c5GybL=tF5BaV8k2Z-QGJtjUhJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACpbDccBj3JKjPLjehgMcR=c5GybL=tF5BaV8k2Z-QGJtjUhJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:42:36 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-c_tgdjj5Ww8tdKeHeMsduM=bWsCEbnN-wfwJatGWsJyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>, MARCELO GABRIEL BAGNULO BRAUN <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000003107059e52e7cf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/b62wsRsUsE2caT2BOCaMaF-cOr0>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:43:08 -0000

Hi, Jana,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:23 AM Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> As promised in Singapore, I am proposing adoption of the following drafts
> in ICCRG:
> LEDBAT++: draft-balasubramanian-iccrg-ledbatplusplus-01
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balasubramanian-iccrg-ledbatplusplus-01>
> rLEDBAT: draft-bagnulo-iccrg-rledbat-01
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bagnulo-iccrg-rledbat-01>
>

Yes, please. Fixing problems in IETF Experimental protocols sounds like a
fine thing for ICCRG to do ...

Best,

Spencer


> I don't think we need to have a long discussion on process here, and I
> believe we can figure it out as it goes. But I will summarize what I said
> in Singapore. Adoption here simply means that the RG thinks these are
> well-documented solutions to potentially important problems. We expect the
> authors to iterate on the drafts with continuous engagement with the RG.
> Our intent is to only ship documents that have rough consensus.
>
> If folks have an opinion on the adoption of either of these documents,
> either in favor or opposing, please respond on this thread. I will close
> this call in about 2 weeks, modulo discussion or opinions opposing adoption.
>
> - jana
> _______________________________________________
> iccrg mailing list
> iccrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg
>