Re: [iccrg] BBR draft
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Fri, 18 December 2020 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ncardwell@google.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9275B3A095F for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:59:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W30yg_dFB-0R for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE193A094E for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id s13so620490vkb.11 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:59:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mgEAUhOXMgLPbPIfINseX6fLS/mxXWx24Vuzo/g3IOQ=; b=c0VNQy1qXCh92TmfL8l3Eb4xTHhT21AwgAAqMe4DgFHrwA51crvJyF2+eFKIzEkI2U zTFg09bk4k6bJdHGur3l2Rm5B/P+Rq9SLK9dKxr00NM660WwWmUMe3PGe+8SqVC059lR EHhvC5uLq/RkdcoCl+M3rSX68PYS0iI96YvIAgCuLUum68ruwKTQkVv5Zxl/qNSPy8zs pkjG+uQc6gtElH6zsRidsHkM8DJ/RaqR6yeC85tzxknUQz6+gWQF2VowlgZk+aH+B/VH p3PPdfoxq9rj8yIOemqkoAnQKAp5Pes00OU0sqnYYyjisCoMbRkCi+W5mnHzkYAVZGSG 6JUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mgEAUhOXMgLPbPIfINseX6fLS/mxXWx24Vuzo/g3IOQ=; b=KuJ87c5bPBGSaNPhiLx90T3HPsj9HZNVPZ0LNQUcMxOx1T4B3nk3BkXx00CGDKjNet 151XxrQdyRBYXuIIWuv0HDlBlRkVDrxYO8916wnQ5f3Y5n+PgbCExzW51/RDyi330JKF uTyEdRpAL+lWKIv3IwNZwoUVw+IZWFu8NM4hsWG4hruGjCgLtP7xnYOPtfh/5y+FAOFM +n4BqNZmQOEBLHCwgPyS1A+Sq/G+LbPE0dsCDLsVa5N7SoAg7LNiwHBixGhF0wJviAnD +fQS6BzPQP2OLb6wY/zv9dfTzNaJwD9XafFQAJwORhkLhe0qCluUMqeYlh3OexT7wKWk ZVHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kVn6UTqC2TAdBRzQU/S3IQ2TQHW9EThFbiRN0SL6kMZn4u9D6 KEGpG5ybj3Zj1PBm8JMz7pJkAFLBrwik0HRbAsl+cQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyu8NdD55oUVd0tv4eEIbpA0enDCHrQirl6CBNVqKUsg904llTfUCjCFzrmr0CkdqTwN1e3QErHTmZE3CyEZPE=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:8d92:: with SMTP id p140mr5145782vkd.19.1608307153015; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 07:59:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxSVpKb5oaGkNv=UyYKa5Os8UvLCisBdMruCwDEMKHowkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxSVpKb5oaGkNv=UyYKa5Os8UvLCisBdMruCwDEMKHowkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:58:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CADVnQykrLjKGewbsvoov1f1XtkpKXbKKVXG5P4iFQCLrqfPREQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c208a05b6bf30b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/q10cqm9kHWx7E2ikKWysy2rtZzo>
Subject: Re: [iccrg] BBR draft
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:59:20 -0000
Hi Martin, Yes, we agree with the value of an Internet Draft to document that algorithm, and we intend to update the BBR draft to cover BBRv2. However, there are currently a few things on our team's to-do list that are in line ahead of updating the draft. Primarily, we want to finish tuning the algorithm to meet all of our performance targets, so we can finish rolling it out for all Google production traffic. Currently BBRv2 is used for the vast majority of Google production TCP traffic, but it is not deployed for external TCP/QUIC traffic outside of global A/B experiments for a small percentage of google.com and YouTube users. best, neal On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:05 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote: > Neal, > > Is there intent to update the now badly-outdated BBR draft? I know there > is open-source code but having something written down in words is very > valuable. > > Thanks > Martin >
- [iccrg] BBR draft Martin Duke
- Re: [iccrg] BBR draft Neal Cardwell
- Re: [iccrg] BBR draft Jana Iyengar