[iccrg] cwnd 4 in BBRv2?
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E021D1203A4 for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8htznnVuRhZ for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396861204F4 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id z17so23927060qts.13 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Z1sQn0JqOF/oWFo7vES5c2Oz9p8nhJdsP1OLCF61Pw=; b=gBWJcVcI6jdJaizFWjUnKkXtGNNI4gSv5aeRxzRAvpP5kjOsW/Ef2hp/NbVh9FL60B 5aHH4TKs1Voqs4TkpTJOSBbn3yY+vTpky3J5ZJIdclTTQHncrCYmYd2WkxyPCC/1Vep6 zfyQa2/eIt3AGdNw8Qqhp6bPrAag9tGl5YCBhNkDEzEjZiB8acaYSSk6e4ZHTNry+uv3 IBwi3HFE2KwzweejFTWtAL8OgPOmw7Lj/wcj+C0D+GL1iVCmLEtqR4MvREoW8z+ob1c0 6/xI2cqZrAKQ7C5O5yl/Ud5ZNZanwyx0Y3CGihqxoRRVVAEBMzXxXL0GMkTCqMYXoh3o cJlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Z1sQn0JqOF/oWFo7vES5c2Oz9p8nhJdsP1OLCF61Pw=; b=uT6EiUE8L3z6thdlT4Zbja49uafTn6Kf4TrwzJ7Ox/TgU98YNhHUnP4JZLtshj95U7 aO7CSe49864S3nobkjzdGWOv9f82mWF1CLk5Ibbj8iE/QSn6EIBANfgXJ9rVSAR0gm95 Xdcwj1mSlLyBHtBvtP6Q5gXU8RzTJqRBUaIWPkO5qd9kGNwINH56LRirP9kf3wD1U6D8 Ac/q412AgeUlV5eu8sAgYs6x9Aeg/LEmsxPz6gLWPbyC6v1SU/Dw442xYPUegTPVa9m8 wPir84hX4+EfJBRUJORr0OWKGEQrSDhD2LZm+vpxnFJEwFFlIKJD/auDiO+UUr6qhJds lH4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwuFvPfCQZkgRgvrIHO1LvM2GwgqE/Wp9AGq09mxViiY7K6Kqm ApncSb14Qh7XG90Cg/GlXChtCtBmWdVj9kDivLE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9uwCef0bI4pG4qpd+SkdW9kM2/LapiNcpcWfs6PZKRCQY0LBD8489SvPu4BTLj7DcJeyyOvPYFNc9Nm6TT+0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3786:: with SMTP id d6mr36466509qtc.328.1553792999236; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:09:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7ME=9E=6Vb++7F1BoEPC_qSsvgNVAzfr8HCOFLS=zQrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, BBR Development <bbr-dev@googlegroups.com>, iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/rmbGWI7gYDDT0okCnHKtDwzUki4>
Subject: [iccrg] cwnd 4 in BBRv2?
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:10:31 -0000
I just finished watching the sessions in ietf iccrg... and although I have many questions about BBRv2, I am curious if the cwnd in it is capped to a minimum of 4, not 2, still? BBRv1 is... https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c#L385 -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740
- [iccrg] cwnd 4 in BBRv2? Dave Taht
- Re: [iccrg] [bbr-dev] cwnd 4 in BBRv2? Neal Cardwell