[iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CE8120111 for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:23:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bOkyYMC3kzrX for <iccrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2B9120112 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n18so11322932ljo.7 for <iccrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:23:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eJwxcKCNf1sslEPE5x7S0mr4HHZnRAsz3b6CaqNkWeQ=; b=p0LyLWY3r3qPQ2U7DYbnwVrmYRrHR6HjadyGrPZuIecS047toj/iyM1TkxxgeuAimc rbTAuvyUSjBBoGXKoEQwY8SAXzCFe/aXzslligXFn1g4bCT3sFcYmafwMtCN6zLnWrUO 3QTiDm6b3ZyYF09RR43bZgd3I62IjCrOKE22X2YjaVUsImFhH/3HBxzZF7nx1z3fa/VF GfGGpQJpVcWd+QuL/xCjnOZb43F/7O+lCe2mVCxhXx5ZSu+qEY/RARKFdD3NHU2xkoWX IntEmkH83ezAv7kumw5kscGjNCLg1GWr/noTFsqjQPVCd54X6TYGnGNbkDEtZLeezrPT CdRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eJwxcKCNf1sslEPE5x7S0mr4HHZnRAsz3b6CaqNkWeQ=; b=FdI7pVwohQ/SEYB6ARGPbnsYodoXvGkwNWn59xOfWnpepb1FAg53oUTFa35YdrqHjA tC18a8s9sjZSJiQOaIw0KOo3Isx1/fC16cyZn6wbkxp29Y7kP8c1mbkytMnM+3qSlcHT 33QsInswNlOtQ+CdN/5RtKi6wKUAbO4ouvGIIGoon8EHO4+lMgjO3Rz3mZmtyLqqkgiZ DUOIacM3XkQU6KmW3W3a6XRMyjEUr0/N281GxUNhV6bh0apMrxLPmcg04zR+6BRzSc0l SnSoLbLlL6Arw9usdCECDEo+Vik425cf7Fq4LScT8xfwn0J4QaGUOLgLwm2KXcYaaLeX k6nQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXs7R5yx58IQzM/63jQ16QAAr7DFkE6uuMUK4/6iJoMk/YsCa+t PhkebfA4gYFtiiRv81X2pTnXSPjbELjKqD5nF9qxDTOOZf4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyzHx81K8phBgPwbwUz3XexeenfrNO1EbZglfVTCYqVoxoVaZ98MGm/55YZFhanl5BidrIxEgiZewz9BA34rWY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2201:: with SMTP id i1mr4145490lji.110.1581423824337; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:23:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:23:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CACpbDccBj3JKjPLjehgMcR=c5GybL=tF5BaV8k2Z-QGJtjUhJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: iccrg IRTF list <iccrg@irtf.org>
Cc: MARCELO GABRIEL BAGNULO BRAUN <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a000e059e4bed63"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iccrg/xeLrUkMT2wA0FaYY4nS2hwf6FCI>
Subject: [iccrg] Adoption of rLEDBAT and LEDBAT++
X-BeenThere: iccrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of Internet Congestion Control Research Group \(ICCRG\)" <iccrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iccrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iccrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/iccrg>, <mailto:iccrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:23:48 -0000

Hello all,

As promised in Singapore, I am proposing adoption of the following drafts
in ICCRG:
LEDBAT++: draft-balasubramanian-iccrg-ledbatplusplus-01
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balasubramanian-iccrg-ledbatplusplus-01>
rLEDBAT: draft-bagnulo-iccrg-rledbat-01
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bagnulo-iccrg-rledbat-01>

I don't think we need to have a long discussion on process here, and I
believe we can figure it out as it goes. But I will summarize what I said
in Singapore. Adoption here simply means that the RG thinks these are
well-documented solutions to potentially important problems. We expect the
authors to iterate on the drafts with continuous engagement with the RG.
Our intent is to only ship documents that have rough consensus.

If folks have an opinion on the adoption of either of these documents,
either in favor or opposing, please respond on this thread. I will close
this call in about 2 weeks, modulo discussion or opinions opposing adoption.

- jana