Re: [Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19.txt

Hi,

Still a few questions:

The text in section 7.1 says:

   "With regard to pruning of duplicate candidate pairs, a Trickle ICE
   agent SHOULD follow a policy of keeping the higher priority candidate
   unless it is peer reflexive."

Wasn't there a question on the "unless it is peer reflexive" part?

---

The text in section 8.1 says:

      "2.  The agent eliminates redundant pairs by following the rules in
       Section 5.1.3 of [rfc5245bis], but only if the old pair has a
       state of Waiting or Frozen (thus avoiding removal of pairs for
       which connectivity checks are in flight or for which connectivity
       checks have already yielded a definitive result)."

I realized that Section 5.1.3 of 5245bis does not talk about eliminating of pairs - it only talks about eliminating of redundant candidates. So, shouldn't the eliminating of pairs be covered in section 7.1?

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Ice [mailto:ice-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: 05 April 2018 19:32
To: ice@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ice] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19.txt

This version addresses IESG feedback.

On 4/5/18 11:29 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Interactive Connectivity Establishment WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Trickle ICE: Incremental Provisioning of Candidates for the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Protocol
>         Authors         : Emil Ivov
>                           Eric Rescorla
>                           Justin Uberti
>                           Peter Saint-Andre
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19.txt
> 	Pages           : 32
> 	Date            : 2018-04-05
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes "Trickle ICE", an extension to the
>    Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) protocol that enables
>    ICE agents to begin connectivity checks while they are still
>    gathering candidates, by incrementally "trickling" candidates over
>    time.  This method can considerably accelerate the process of
>    establishing a communication session.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ice-trickle/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ice-trickle-19
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ice mailing list
> Ice@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice
> 

_______________________________________________
Ice mailing list
Ice@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice