IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 21 April 2020 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F583A0B5B; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpODEx7Zo8fL; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30046.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F2A83A0B45; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VqmQEA/QxucmxEe8KEPSm55pgkp02mvpHq8iRpcSD30gHRHjIzp906SaJ9b07Bcpi8Ndu980ldctfwc6qkge+36+PJQ1O4akCNEZ0VftPv4JVI0WrZwhMf/mI9vh/OC5wQh35pJ9xfOwW//NkcvVR6n0G5lb+jadNoOgi7yGyYLrrfa5V2HmrulE+8gSwNj6xWlkDyzHLD/JFEwfpX2LcaTxRK4MZPkLLagHlwDtCFpWjQaKHO0RmSS3BeEdqPdPaa9MxN2Y+W+96Bq51l/huQBqNsp6bZ0pN5uWmLp85T3TXUeX44PGc1/G+8oEGUcLMmDwDKyK9e8uyGPulkiCfg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yBFIP1IpV8DbBF9HgOrx5R9rfX9O5Kws31Bm4nixtrI=; b=Ji/0vm09wjfesvFBM+Cys++HSXqB+G6KFD0R3ozlkEGHRv94+evIXk8bJ9VXllD4otYm6OOQdpYQHVj0GYk4dI0WrXLFlTr/G55ztCDQEi21kcgvahJrlawMBuj7l8SbmvrCYesR+PLV0HBU4KBIQJG+T8jXisVnUTjbsNd2ICA50rIfS55CBhdvbT0x0CM+tYws8OOkDGFHaVLpYFMN+3FmiX3Cb5r+2/6DTqKqc+Le464+MmxKzD34BWifPt4Hvsp8YNRLW93MCHj+WRqb9lu0tywKZF3L1aPHhgCVshctztyObXUefteLHMzv2EW11vIZvFZHsYY07Wj1IUI8mg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yBFIP1IpV8DbBF9HgOrx5R9rfX9O5Kws31Bm4nixtrI=; b=i9+AJa4kDmnSH1z6PrtUAu9OIIIQZX/kD0xtmlWQV2mPyZsVd24Xp+r94H1nlwAIoBnF7WB0JkhnRmPE5aYZbrn/PYcjSUqTco6SBI9SHu2vT1yVfWJAaDyFo8T+/ZemAFLC7+BSJlgZXUwlaLSfTwC1JO389/Muav3DFLgY2Zw=
Received: from AM0PR07MB3987.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:46::31) by AM0PR07MB5315.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:208:f2::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.9; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:45:17 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB3987.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b929:4e5c:6b46:3ccc]) by AM0PR07MB3987.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b929:4e5c:6b46:3ccc%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2937.012; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:45:17 +0000
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org>, "ice-chairs@ietf.org" <ice-chairs@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWF+laI4/pE3h93EGf6P2uFHYjPqiD9msAgAAgJACAADgzgA==
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:45:17 +0000
Message-ID: <44A1FCA8-0405-49D2-8589-45D1C9CBFAF4@ericsson.com>
References: <158747937967.30818.11917169559141666632@ietfa.amsl.com> <79EF9BAD-FA0C-4019-AF2C-A3A8FFC988A4@ericsson.com> <1387C0B3-1693-4A8D-83A0-0F93B99A407C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1387C0B3-1693-4A8D-83A0-0F93B99A407C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [188.127.223.154]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0db105e-ae4b-4f9c-03f4-08d7e63d4858
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB5315:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM0PR07MB531538202B24FF5EF5CC6F6293D50@AM0PR07MB5315.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 038002787A
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM0PR07MB3987.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(66446008)(66476007)(4326008)(66556008)(64756008)(224303003)(2616005)(44832011)(33656002)(81156014)(8936002)(66946007)(54906003)(5660300002)(86362001)(6506007)(498600001)(186003)(71200400001)(6486002)(110136005)(76116006)(2906002)(53546011)(36756003)(26005)(6512007)(66574012)(91956017); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VaT7kIrrbNSgb/vLs2XMmuWlDrxtOID185n6Q7HRfouq1zyVzmZNvqZo7grn3zfq+qGgSLf1ajhHhH38DNmD9d3kWYfcDAOxjkkqAO/penTIZWBkG7K/ThD8OyOVVALD6z+aUp1hJnBv/+mglIS5GU6DXW4/Lh6qEsU+Y6KPkHnoa5Ed8H4xKsizpuaxJUXPuSHGVmO8cXr5sbXxtNTrf60G24SNK0sTtqNRjAu3AM1VKM1/SWy9Z5zN1JCInDyg/eJSNc1klzPl0RCvTyh7wUs36D9UAIHdVr1FVqTRjSReUNyaThLKlpPFp8QkYJC+8m8SqI100I83rghCmh+MoQ8ApCYP39tH36647WpgOJphMLbBCZcv0B+yeoPfm+rw94V+Y/eNYT4wWOJi1/P/IZQMOIYq0SvEbsJwzIw9p5/vnS72MN9h/125YEImzLCV
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 2i+BiQnRkvFYCjLL+4reYggkyGrQgf3lmZnpVoHnhFaN++5bUNYnrdkl6CSBa51KqjsFdVLR73g4q8F0RVPTToduhR4km9UGstb4yxOgxuOUuhM/t2UgoUyvsPrET0dx6r/dhmnB6NRS9YO1dwFw9Q==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F8B8F8391F92DE4BBCA955E8A485CE4A@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0db105e-ae4b-4f9c-03f4-08d7e63d4858
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2020 21:45:17.6906 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: HYErgBaGtiO0mvtJabqiogy6q4QHavJ6IFZ9jGsB4u5g0YJ9EqmV0zzNMrBhvvPcL2ypUqXhGGVqG0APT9LnJi/TOhBacBVltI/BwXFnsL0=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB5315
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/TWpNcf3gvaVQlrpk0ZgXs1IR6tU>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:45:30 -0000

Hi Éric,

Thanks for your comments! Unless Justin says it's not a race condition, I'll keep it :)

Regards,

Christer

On 21/04/2020, 22.24, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hello Christer,
    
    Thank you for the explanation about the update of a document still "blocked" in the RFC editor queue. Up to you and your responsible AD.
    
    Even after Barry's kind explanations about "race conditions" (in French "conditions de course" :-) ...), I feel that this does not apply to this document (cfr use case in section 3.1) but I really do not mind. Just wanted to raise a flag.
    
    Regards and thank you for your document
    
    -éric
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
    Date: Tuesday, 21 April 2020 at 18:29
    To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
    Cc: "draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org>, "ice-chairs@ietf.org" <ice-chairs@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
    Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)
    
        Hi Éric,
    
        Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
    
            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
            COMMENT:
            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
            > Thank you for this short and easy to read document.
            >
            > But, I cannot refrain from wondering about this part as the trickle-ice I-D is
            > still in RFC editor queue => easier to fix it in the body of the trickle-ice
            > IMHO (could be wrong): "[RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please replace RFC XXXX with the RFC
            > number of draft-ietf-ice-trickle once it has been published.  Please also
            >   indicate that this specification updates RFC XXXX.]"
    
        Originally we assumed that trickle-ice was going to be published before ice-pac. The reason trickle-ice has been on hold in the RFC editor queue is because it is part of the Cluster 238 collection of drafts, which all are intended to be published at the same time.
    
        Having said that, we think it is more clear to fix both RFC 8445 and trickle-ice in the same place (this draft). Much of the content is describing the problems, and making the trickle update in trickle-ice would mean that we would have to copy/paste most of the text there.
    
            > I also wonder why section 1 talks about 'race conditions' while the issue is
            > related to a too short default time-out or in the use cases of section 3. (in
            > my mind, 'race conditions' is an unusual sequence of events).
    
        English is not my native language, so I hope Justin can comment on this.
    
        Regards,
    
        Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email