[Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 04:08 UTC
Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8241200FD for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.205
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlT0eRDbXhrZ for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00E41200F3 for <ice@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 21:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id u124so9734847vsu.2 for <ice@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vPt2arqcesDmlfycA5mYEb8iQ8tJRFWPF1aDm7K//2o=; b=IsZUzLTzJhAg4kOY69sdcY2R1A0Kj8MKjSNZnw6YeyIq9qLmYD4+YgNQnJ0TjSffIy flRTAh4AwXIoB1h1GRIo9qxFDQbOHG2TExSRHaa+codfm6JjDqmhS1WMe0pXWgvCwaXe 1BliWUhW8cVkTYHtLTtBPiX5NObV/zpvOnTBnG8+98QZf6KmAKifmd2i76pKc0ejv2Lg 6Y+R6zrKRveDJePUUClp1i/ojDw3ece2znEpsvTBHEBFkakt9pNpltd5qZbl07jLuhde t+jEvtqS8aOdQz1Pcj7lJm9ntRu9POdQPfFm81W/N5E1BakLR2p/50l8s5kqG/+2CkmD HIfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vPt2arqcesDmlfycA5mYEb8iQ8tJRFWPF1aDm7K//2o=; b=F7HsjUQg/hhAyZ2pd8UuhObfA7zY6FVAjyQV24vq43moqldTQydNBjefmMuINLYuSx QgHuBxavNcUHDMfV0xCIfiHes0lOoHJ6jkVMqfs0iSzi8CBkH+NsaR136Qski46gj7N7 RfGKTQpa6sJfula1wFZM1M0RnVWvJQ3PDWNtdADWnsKgMWyntMbyaHXVWXgXvhgpHMXU AgJzQt1y2R87sSG+IutQdIJdGY9wniVESDigfoQ2e1Xpq5m+YCT20NzoFaeCZdcIt/Q1 L90XVabatC7ZpLFLib2mhbQk96cSrGk4wHj1InDFmHPcQVFfXvTE4okOQeiqcHRQQFMM vvfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVygDv4FbtdqBv20yMScIaapcz76SzASedOmsVx1sfHWc4/VQwK 4QYL7kjn+Pcgs48IZ7taKolRJXvGmBqcPlday4lzYbm2q6iCWw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwr2HWN7hdaD5UV8v6C6WSbTdZ3DxT47UcFUJ50+m1uuk0Afg7rR2Re5iUO6rMbU8B/Yvj5QTQaLGkPX2uyCDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:d48b:: with SMTP id g11mr12702644vsj.63.1562645319142; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 21:08:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUGdixUj7EbQg=p7Vi25gik=Ut5fGWAFF8gAGGoUSZJMDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028971e058d37b748"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/YFlKqRAQGqovAz4dCrftn0plPzk>
Subject: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not we should meet at IETF 105
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 04:08:43 -0000
It appears to me that nearly all of the issues with ICE-PAC have been discussed and reached a conclusion and solution with the following PRs: https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/15 https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/16 https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-ice-pac/pull/17 Once we merge those PRs, nearly all of the issues of ICE-PAC will be resolved and we can likely move to WGLC. If so, then we don't have much to discuss in a f2f and we cancel the meeting currently scheduled for IETF 105. Does anyone see a need for a f2f in Montreal? So, please say so now. Otherwise, we will likely cancel it.
- [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or not … Peter Thatcher
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Peter Thatcher
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Justin Uberti
- Re: [Ice] Getting ICE-PAC to WGLC and whether or … Ari Keränen