Re: [Ice] Confirmation about tie breaker behavior changes ICEbis
Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Thu, 29 March 2018 15:06 UTC
Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E823212DA25 for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8VIzxwKYopMR for <ice@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1585912E870 for <ice@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l201so11364807wmg.0 for <ice@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iuF12k5YbpbL10MS+0dGb2LPxsECd44p4M0hO/558Fc=; b=eDQFfsAWXH6+gINHrsRsaQGaC/sQ5+COXVKv59X0Rvu5+rD7Qj72sDeDJpenJdzEBL sTrzdHl5PWygrjhZYc37aGR8fTNE/gvEIQnOELLTKEZAl4qNTJAFOcWnqXJdm+yEPok5 w4wQ9N+PH/w1ID++uN2G//GbmMP8+1Y8bLtu+SOidW4lx7dG3UEjFIwNyOxPHk4HWhY7 WC8KZcKE3uP407OciBdYk2TXHoTHsWpLsP/u70Ol9+pu/v5bGtL1iezlHZWqJRbXLieS o/6itgYeFgfbgzjwm3fqxh1S2SmBTXUI9gxCMXqXZkqd0OtLaoQbB5+uKR1zujHCusaD uuEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iuF12k5YbpbL10MS+0dGb2LPxsECd44p4M0hO/558Fc=; b=hDzp4jp3b6OXzRP2A1FeGWtv0PoInMEsArKqQbHqgQa2L/fg9mTB+vzEltwdSh1ySE Pj80Ve+YOtHr9AjNO7PE/cXs67m5F+jtrKkZPnESgU2TvS2VJPrSYnw0geRM1TZ7aB8H 9o9a80jLLGAxT25Hutns8hoqm20/nOIgDS8+wSI9847oIWZU7tRf/SIwnnWThqNYWaTm adkBPlixjuxlFDIewC6Yk2aCW2JfvWGbWxPqn6sOuJ204Ddqgi4C72C8IPwN7D8tZNLD E0L8TpK4jhXtUNBeQD0USUYn4nke1K46ZERavrve9fWW+L+3gXIr/hkG28yKfe6Az5zP 6+0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GNWVbglWeXod8fIFpPjun+sXnCuQPO9lXWR+37iwp5q2qRRByy 5MEYCk0t+ZZ8ByRD8nbbb6NSQFha4oRgfnnW0s1x/LyL
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+zSsmQG2Vyr/NkUudUBHWXLPBo5Hx9+OWFLdvnyRgPPLC+PZFghyv++lvIhdn54jSm/UPLC8u6PWfVU89gEBE=
X-Received: by 10.28.63.212 with SMTP id m203mr6354379wma.124.1522335955165; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 08:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJrXDUHs9gLVS8fZc0Gcc08mYui25mim0CX_K4B1X9XO38qFAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUHs9gLVS8fZc0Gcc08mYui25mim0CX_K4B1X9XO38qFAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:05:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUGWDcRpm+acMURagf_Gy9CT5BSmSto+mgRy0wsE5ad5Hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: ICE WG <ice@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b4174d6b5b805688e75a4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/YGMcvmwgO3pROPt2jJZkE3htsD4>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Confirmation about tie breaker behavior changes ICEbis
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:06:10 -0000
Since we haven't heard anything, we're going to declare consensus and proceed with publication. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote: > In the changes to ICEbis during the IESG review (thanks again Christer!), > there is one item that has come up that is not just editorial: > > The changing of the tie breaker value during a role change due to role > conflict has changed from a MAY to a MUST. This was to address the very > rare situation when both sides choose the same tie breaker value. > > If you disagree with this change, please let it be known. If we don't > hear anything, we will assume consensus and proceed with publication of > ICEbis. > > Thanks! > > > > By the way, you can read rest of the changes to ICEbis at the links below, > but in my opinion as shepherd after reading through all of them thoroughly, > they are editorial except for this issue. > > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-17.txt&url2=draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-20.txt >
- [Ice] Confirmation about tie breaker behavior cha… Peter Thatcher
- Re: [Ice] Confirmation about tie breaker behavior… Peter Thatcher