[icnrg] Carsten Bormann's Yes on draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-04: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 26 September 2023 14:55 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carsten Bormann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>
Cc: draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv@ietf.org, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org, icnrg@irtf.org, ietf@dkutscher.net, ietf@dkutscher.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.de>
Message-ID: <169574011177.55086.16704716024742914504@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:55:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/0CfHgBEaWjwueK2_XxAinncFchQ>
Subject: [icnrg] Carsten Bormann's Yes on draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-04: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann has entered the following ballot position for
draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv-04: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have previously reviewed this document: a useful exposition of a compact
representation of time intervals in protocols.

Nits:

67108863.0000000 is wrong.

RFC editor style is quotes, not emphasis, for document titles mentioned in the
text (here: abstract); there is nothing wrong with giving the RFC number
instead (or as well) as long as it doesn't look like a bibliography reference.

[icnrg] Carsten Bormann's Yes on draft-irtf-icnrg… Carsten Bormann via Datatracker