[icnrg] CCNx Selectors draft
"Mosko, Marc <mmosko@parc.com>" <mmosko@parc.com> Wed, 08 May 2019 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <mmosko@parc.com>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8BC1200EC for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=parc.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfSiIOUl6Fxv for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 14:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr740053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.74.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD9C1200E0 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2019 14:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parc.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-parc-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Iif6T2thA/vg7A80QB3pyyEN3jIePmmzi5cUpBqQksA=; b=cTbnVUTnWdmdwm0CoKnDinnK/zh94j2CQZj5w/Cy/pE9TDAsePHeZRgnEbilE/Sq48ZmGj+MtHgLQmXKDi9RbrE9Wrlt9SOe3RYdUIt4PgU4S57ta04dgeK+FG+Rb3Koofb3rsB6dGQzHNDo95NqLLOFmiPfnoLepBVv1ezLbpw=
Received: from BN8PR15MB3266.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.74.19) by BN8PR15MB3379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.75.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1856.12; Wed, 8 May 2019 21:17:50 +0000
Received: from BN8PR15MB3266.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::91ce:a806:b5f0:b7a6]) by BN8PR15MB3266.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::91ce:a806:b5f0:b7a6%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1856.012; Wed, 8 May 2019 21:17:50 +0000
From: "Mosko, Marc <mmosko@parc.com>" <mmosko@parc.com>
To: icnrg <icnrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: CCNx Selectors draft
Thread-Index: AQHVBeMdhdnxMsssG0+4GZJN91/tNg==
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 21:17:50 +0000
Message-ID: <BN8PR15MB3266DAB32A82E3E67E50497DAD320@BN8PR15MB3266.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mmosko@parc.com;
x-originating-ip: [13.1.110.60]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0afdee7-05f8-4be1-7d51-08d6d3faa06b
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BN8PR15MB3379;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR15MB3379:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR15MB337933F27D4BF4BB34AF259BAD320@BN8PR15MB3379.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0031A0FFAF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(346002)(366004)(39850400004)(136003)(376002)(189003)(199004)(316002)(86362001)(73956011)(52536014)(3480700005)(8676002)(76116006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(68736007)(36542004)(5660300002)(4744005)(14454004)(7116003)(478600001)(66066001)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(66446008)(66946007)(99286004)(26005)(305945005)(256004)(14444005)(8936002)(33656002)(9686003)(486006)(74316002)(186003)(6436002)(55016002)(6116002)(3846002)(6916009)(3450700001)(102836004)(81156014)(476003)(2906002)(25786009)(81166006)(7696005)(53936002)(7736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR15MB3379; H:BN8PR15MB3266.namprd15.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: parc.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AMoc+mc9k4IGTODTEIJ+UlI8ITaCG0MdxOAE3B5Ge33YUFvkjP2WF9Nna2DEck/kAaBYukpTRoZAuUvFz3WigLkSOXY3ZRIVa81USLb8V1d5TuYPfxxHSWxfIK3u3Th91msxj5vXKxjIkkUgb0t1/gQS00qhcytnz3RcF+Q2zAVJ7Nd4MAv7Ve4duZOUdSd4l11XOomp0TXhaGEeerp3Q7ETP+wEkQ+Fj26OxYAWQxrS8vfGu7YdSr+2vBFzvqHMAeEofB8H3RXP1XZhmvqdzDwC98IxqQFwjnLy8zNTJHGDQsfZwsoLsR882LqiSW4fzL77mz9pJZ2KSTH3eMbkJSW7GgYscgj/RCAfbvpmzrrwb3yKYa1NgZ2pvO8aiJqcZILW0gwFZds5zgeVi/12x+TW4XSF6+VbepzE6aJ1edM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: parc.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0afdee7-05f8-4be1-7d51-08d6d3faa06b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2019 21:17:50.4358 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 733d6903-c9f1-4a0f-b05b-d75eddb52d0d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR15MB3379
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/-jm0pM-98t9d9NmkTOGjkm81yXg>
Subject: [icnrg] CCNx Selectors draft
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 21:17:55 -0000
All, In making final edits to the CCNx specifications, I found that we cited the CCNx Selectors draft from a github website, as the version there had some updates not found in the original expired draft. I've made a few more edits and submitted the updated selectors draft to IETF so the CCNx spec can reference it from there and not use my personal github. This document has not been considered for acceptance as an RG document. If there is sufficient interest in working out a good discovery protocol that operates over CCNx, I'd like to talk about that. This Selectors draft is meant to be a proof-of-concept that sticks pretty closely to the original CCNx 0.x mechanism. Marc
- [icnrg] CCNx Selectors draft Mosko, Marc <mmosko@parc.com>
- Re: [icnrg] CCNx Selectors draft David R. Oran
- Re: [icnrg] CCNx Selectors draft Mosko, Marc <mmosko@parc.com>