[icnrg] Resolving the ballot comments on draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch

"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Thu, 19 November 2020 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BF73A0FB6; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:38:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3g_gvtPbybeI; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:38:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FD43A0F5E; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([IPv6:2601:184:407f:80ce:bd4e:99a7:8350:bfaa]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id 0AJIVdB7032420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:31:41 -0800
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: "Mallory Knodel" <mknodel@cdt.org>, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, irtf-chair <irtf-chair@irtf.org>
Cc: "The IRSG" <irsg@irtf.org>, ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:31:33 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5737)
Message-ID: <1CAEF486-341B-411C-9CBB-6EDA55E76CB9@orandom.net>
References: <160581041927.13669.15053749519312973677@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_795A2160-A609-4AEC-AFC9-67F22C02A29A_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/5ItaU9Igp507tLrNaAXV_NuzGeU>
Subject: [icnrg] Resolving the ballot comments on draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:38:54 -0000

I believe this version addresses all the IRSG ballot comments and 
contains new text specifically around my responses to Mallory & 
Spencer’s comments on the ballot (and which we informally resolved via 

If so, this should be ready for progression to IESG conflict review and 
RFC editor processing. Thanks to everybody who read and commented on 

I’ve attached a diff from the prior version in case you want to review 
the changes only.


Forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: David Oran <daveoran@orandom.net>et>, Dave Oran 
> <daveoran@orandom.net>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06.txt
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:26:59 -0800
> A new version of I-D, draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Dave Oran and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name:		draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch
> Revision:	06
> Title:		Considerations in the development of a QoS Architecture for 
> CCNx-like ICN protocols
> Document date:	2020-11-19
> Group:		icnrg
> Pages:		29
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06.txt
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/
> Html:           
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06.html
> Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06
> Diff:           
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-06
> Abstract:
>    This is a position paper.  It documents the author's personal views
>    on how Quality of Service (QoS) capabilities ought to be 
> accommodated
>    in ICN protocols like CCNx or NDN which employ flow-balanced
>    Interest/Data exchanges and hop-by-hop forwarding state as their
>    fundamental machinery.  It argues that such protocols demand a
>    substantially different approach to QoS from that taken in TCP/IP,
>    and proposes specific design patterns to achieve both 
> classification
>    and differentiated QoS treatment on both a flow and aggregate 
> basis.
>    It also considers the effect of caches in addition to memory, CPU 
> and
>    link bandwidth as a resource that should be subject to explicitly
>    unfair resource allocation.  The proposed methods are intended to
>    operate purely at the network layer, providing the primitives 
> needed
>    to achieve both transport and higher layer QoS objectives.  It
>    explicitly excludes any discussion of Quality of Experience (QoE)
>    which can only be assessed and controlled at the application layer 
> or
>    above.
>    This document is not a product of the IRTF Information-Centric
>    Networking Research Group (ICNRG) but has been through formal last
>    call and has the support of the participants in the research group
>    for publication as an individual submission.
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat