Re: [icnrg] [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> to Informational RFC

Jungha Hong <> Thu, 29 July 2021 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FF13A1461 for <>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ukZEfuKH-5V1 for <>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7913A144F for <>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO ( by with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2021 15:41:22 +0900
Received: from [] (HELO ([]) by with SMTP id 24aadc5461024d92; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:41:22 +0900
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=kzfcM6nUHYziXWtwY5iLnImbf2sV9uUlIzqer2pncyjQCSHtEZ8hF6dEn5YJvTW8/Apd9u3z0c ECnO1TrUyJLbE8uBCUdK1lwjzEgCKiOKWmZPwYf2qxOEEwtF+HV3QMj+KQZ7E+t0K9Dg7bl/Hm6U +bz5aKVSRtfS7YqygYV1UmylCv75S7sn7NWtSn85U+m9WoqfjQORn3cSZdWF+tiKSTWzLhUHbBsm NcveLsOHieqtRV1k/TSwldJ1AGj6ZcHOYrN1E94jPpfAHPKl0nHWlzH6pq37iCzokuOsEl7Wfdp8 cnLV8iJdW/Rs7/sQWBw5jp6FDce906F1qNQFg0/Q==; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=selector;; v=1; bh=yQhcvfjF6CgcnXjNRbjPDzKIv7RfxQs5A6dh4Q2DmpE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
Dooray-Meta-Signature: X2xUBemmGJ5PdeikLsPsm7+Y2lT7cJi2FdiNEAxS8RH9FCDgHZZJZ b7UqV6IWYo86s915o7W1VucUCd+W2Cmmzb1Yz6hTpO6WkJGj6mVBaiigzlMafiLUfPLuVCEGghQN +5cTstoN1WoRuXFWogBccBT1l4Wg9FkzJXEZcHLl5cWZGY8UoqFBAVTx1tnfMaAPqi8t0hybDsKW OptrNBNWzgg5M+0J/mQTaPLzzKrjFCg+kjelb3zJouvP7C4v1j5Wx73500OmDQrF4WLnesyvumIC plCfrM4uCKSP20sM0tK+BlQPWYtw2lGfvrRL/+wfX8e1lJdBk/LqDnQVI2ezvE6gGgAxAE6N86R6 ZYP/wM=
Received: from [] (HELO ([]) by with SMTP id de9c027c61024d91; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:41:21 +0900
From: Jungha Hong <>
To: The IRSG <>, Colin Perkins <>
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_920003_779461483.1627540879944"
X-Dsn-Request: true
X-Dooray-Agent: mail-api
X-Dooray-Mail-Id: 3063815739665031411
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Dooray-Attached: c3+LUOpPU/IB7Wl+oemm0lw5HiI/bJHHYClX72L8E3o=
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:41:21 +0900 (KST)
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> to Informational RFC
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:48:53 -0000

Dear Colin,

I just submitted the updated draft, draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-06
I addressed the comments from Stephen Farrell and Mirja Kuhlewind.
Please proceed with it.

As I already responded, I removed the word, 'uniquely' from the sentence.&nbsp;

@Mirja Kuhlewind,
The difference between this document and draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations is explained in the 'Introducton' Section as follows:
"The focus of this document is a Name Resolution Service (NRS) itself as a service or a system in ICN and it provides the functionalities and the design considerations for an NRS in ICN as well as the overview of the NRS approaches in ICN.&nbsp;
On the other hand, its companion document describes considerations from the perspective of ICN architecture and routing system when using an NRS
in ICN."
In other words, this document describes the NRS in ICN but the other one does ICN architecture.
I addressed your comments on Section 4.

Jungha Hong

-----Original Message-----
From: "Colin Perkins" &lt;;
To: "The IRSG" &lt;;;
Cc: &lt;;; &lt;;; &lt;;;
Sent: 2021-07-26 (월) 21:34:06 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: Re: [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: &lt;draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt&gt; to Informational RFC

I’ve closed the IRSG ballot on this draft.&nbsp;

Authors, can you please review the comments at and update the draft if necessary (or explain why no updates are needed).


On 26 Jul 2021, at 13:28, IESG Secretary &lt;; wrote:
The IRSG ballot for &lt;draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt&gt; has beenclosed. The evaluation for this document can be found at