Re: [icnrg] Progressing my QoSArch position paper

On 3 Dec 2019, at 16:29, David R. Oran wrote:

> After discussion with Dirk & Börje, and with the IRTF chair, it seems 
> we can move this through to publication without a formal adoption as 
> an ICNRG RG work item. This to me is the appropriate course given the 
> individual nature of the material and opinions contained in the 
> document.

> I’ll leave to to Dirk and Börje to either confirm this course of 
> action or suggest something different.

Yes, I still think that’s a good way forward.

And, of course, this is just the beginning for QoS work in ICNRG. We are 
hoping that getting this published now would help people to start 
writing specific proposals, share experimentation results.

Best regards,
Dirk

>
> Many thanks,
> DaveO
>
> Forwarded message:
>
>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> To: Dave Oran <daveoran@orandom.net>, David Oran 
>> <daveoran@orandom.net>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-03.txt
>> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:20:29 -0800
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-03.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Dave Oran and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:		draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch
>> Revision:	03
>> Title:		Considerations in the development of a QoS Architecture for 
>> CCNx-like ICN protocols
>> Document date:	2019-12-03
>> Group:		Individual Submission
>> Pages:		25
>> URL:            
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-03.txt
>> Status:         
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/
>> Htmlized:       
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-03
>> Htmlized:       
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch
>> Diff:           
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-03
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This is a position paper.  It documents the author's personal 
>> views
>>    on how Quality of Service (QoS) capabilities ought to be 
>> accommodated
>>    in ICN protocols like CCNx or NDN which employ flow-balanced
>>    Interest/Data exchanges and hop-by-hop forwarding state as their
>>    fundamental machinery.  It argues that such protocols demand a
>>    substantially different approach to QoS from that taken in TCP/IP,
>>    and proposes specific design patterns to achieve both 
>> classification
>>    and differentiated QoS treatment on both a flow and aggregate 
>> basis.
>>    It also considers the effect of caches as a resource in addition 
>> to
>>    memory, CPU and link bandwidth that should be subject to 
>> explicitly
>>    unfair resource allocation.  The proposed methods are intended to
>>    operate purely at the network layer, providing the primitives 
>> needed
>>    to achieve both transport and higher layer QoS objectives.  It
>>    explicitly excludes any discussion of Quality of Experience (QoE)
>>    which can only be assessed and controlled at the application layer 
>> or
>>    above.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg