Re: [icnrg] I just submitted an update to my ICN QoSArch draft

["Anil Jangam (anjangam)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Dave, 

We have reviewed the QoS arch draft and added our comments in the attached word document.

Thank you,
/anil.
 

    This has a number of edits based on comments received so far (not 
    enough!) and offline discussions with a few people.
    
    The major addition is a discussion of what the implications of 
    incorporating INTserv-like QoS features into CCNx or NDN might be.
    
    Comments please!!!!!
    
    DaveO
    
    Forwarded message:
    
    > From: [e-mail]
    > To: [e-mail]
    > Subject: I-D Action: draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-02.txt
    > Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 08:31:59 -0700
    >
    > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
    > directories.
    >
    >
    >         Title           : Considerations in the development of a QoS 
    > Architecture for CCNx-like ICN protocols
    >         Author          : Dave Oran
    > 	Filename        : draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-02.txt
    > 	Pages           : 24
    > 	Date            : 2019-10-12
    >
    > Abstract:
    >    This is a position paper.  It documents the author's personal views
    >    on how Quality of Service (QoS) capabilities ought to be 
    > accommodated
    >    in ICN protocols like CCNx or NDN which employ flow-balanced
    >    Interest/Data exchanges and hop-by-hop forwarding state as their
    >    fundamental machinery.  It argues that such protocols demand a
    >    substantially different approach to QoS from that taken in TCP/IP,
    >    and proposes specific design patterns to achieve both 
    > classification
    >    and differentiated QoS treatment on both a flow and aggregate 
    > basis.
    >    It also considers the effect of caches as a resource in addition to
    >    memory, CPU and link bandwidth that should be subject to explicitly
    >    unfair resource allocation.  The proposed methods are intended to
    >    operate purely at the network layer, providing the primitives 
    > needed
    >    to achieve both transport and higher layer QoS objectives.  It
    >    explicitly excludes any discussion of Quality of Experience (QoE)
    >    which can only be assessed and controlled at the application layer 
    > or
    >    above.
    >
    >
    > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/
    >
    > There are also htmlized versions available at:
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-02
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-02
    >
    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-02
    >
    >
    > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
    > submission
    > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    >
    > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > I-D-Announce mailing list
    > [e-mail]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
    > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
    > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
    
    _______________________________________________
    icnrg mailing list
    [e-mail]
    https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg