[icnrg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01.txt

"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Tue, 27 August 2019 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916A71208EC for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rn-qxmg7Hdwe for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364441208B5 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.171.1] ([IPv6:2001:470:818c:2ff0:91bb:6589:956c:ec5d]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id x7RJ0Ig7004495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:20 -0700
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:11 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5643)
Message-ID: <ECF12C99-8916-4FD6-8B53-A039E9549DBC@orandom.net>
References: <156693225610.5812.17507870596592010222@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/6MY-IqPXjc2Mrsb2C8YdTxlHhcg>
Subject: [icnrg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01.txt
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:00:40 -0000

This update contains a completely-rewritten section on how QoS interacts 
with caching in ICN, based on the comments from Dirk Kutscher.

I didn’t receive any other feedback on the -00 draft, so no other 
parts of the document have been modified,

Hoping to get some good discussion and feedback on this work!

Thanks,
DaveO

Forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01.txt
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:57:36 -0700
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : Considerations in the development of a QoS 
> Architecture for CCNx-like ICN protocols
>         Author          : Dave Oran
> 	Filename        : draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 20
> 	Date            : 2019-08-27
>
> Abstract:
>    This is a position paper.  It documents the author's personal views
>    on how Quality of Service (QoS) capabilities ought to be 
> accommodated
>    in ICN protocols like CCNx or NDN which employ flow-balanced
>    Interest/Data exchanges and hop-by-hop forwarding state as their
>    fundamental machinery.  It argues that such protocols demand a
>    substantially different approach to QoS from that taken in TCP/IP,
>    and proposes specific design patterns to achieve both 
> classification
>    and differentiated QoS treatment on both a flow and aggregate 
> basis.
>    It also considers the effect of caches as a resource in addition to
>    memory, CPU and link bandwidth that should be subject to explicitly
>    un-fair resource allocation.  The proposed methods are intended to
>    operate purely at the network layer, providing the primitives 
> needed
>    to achieve both transport and higher layer QoS objectives.  It
>    explicitly excludes any discussion of Quality of Experience (QoE)
>    which can only be assessed and controlled at the application layer 
> or
>    above.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt