[icnrg] Re: CCNx related drafts
"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Tue, 08 October 2024 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA92C165518 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=crystalorb.net header.b="P9uD0iFi"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=crystalorb.net header.b="plcGRCyx"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybl663skbhkM for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crystalorb.net (omega.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:42e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD786C14F617 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crystalorb.net; s=mail; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EmI+Siv8xpbU7TQ6HcFPSk4aUOBzCpGaS7XMpQUQv/w=; b=P9uD0iFi9Ik5NC/dBfkyIVGF0f OBICKqSaQjus5E8fu8cZOfKZV+Elcsr70dU590ve2hP1AvdROK0D8smNQI40GYjSH2yrf0k8vmHO8 1wZbFncumOZnQD/R6wwKfRmqvb3KrcEESmS/RIEuV5IhZw/2y98bl7T0mgLXPejkAjlo=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crystalorb.net; s=omegamail; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EmI+Siv8xpbU7TQ6HcFPSk4aUOBzCpGaS7XMpQUQv/w=; b=plcGRCyxEob9Ns6/EiOC0fiFmU 6dfxvq1vbOx8HJtMIyi4/WHKMWZlot6D6Qbl4n4G0ZCKWwEcV0IijYhCbnCA==;
Received: from [2601:189:8180:1e4f:9d14:dc72:dd7a:4680] (helo=[192.168.15.248]) by crystalorb.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <daveoran@orandom.net>) id 1sy8tj-00434V-Dv; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 05:12:53 -0700
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: Marc Mosko <marc@mosko.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 08:12:51 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6065)
Message-ID: <45587361-EF53-47D2-B425-7EB305C4E314@orandom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL=SqmVkrp-X8nsn2HNEZxa7abYZrYkLuFb_w6yxQXK4ONyGbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL=SqmVkrp-X8nsn2HNEZxa7abYZrYkLuFb_w6yxQXK4ONyGbg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_F5EE879B-1D89-471C-BEB6-AEAE02E7EB9E_="; micalg="sha-256"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:189:8180:1e4f:9d14:dc72:dd7a:4680
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: daveoran@orandom.net
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on crystalorb.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: 3EA6Y5Y42P5NKOUDYU3S6EQXM5XZBSPX
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3EA6Y5Y42P5NKOUDYU3S6EQXM5XZBSPX
X-MailFrom: daveoran@orandom.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-icnrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [icnrg] Re: CCNx related drafts
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/7Q7DlK6act-BbYrR7QMBiw3b4Nk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:icnrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:icnrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icnrg-leave@irtf.org>
On 7 Oct 2024, at 22:15, Marc Mosko wrote: > All, > > I have been working with Hitoshi Asaeda to restart consideration of two > CCNx drafts. The first is on specifying a chunking name component for CCNx > names and the second is a versioning name component. Here are the links to > the prior drafts that never moved forward before. We have started updating > the CCNx Chunking draft first. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxserialversion/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mosko-icnrg-ccnxchunking/ > > If you have the interest, please take a look at these documents and give us > any feedback. They are brief. The upshots of these drafts would be to > assign TLV types for the name components and related fields. They do not > change any core behavior. > Thanks for picking this up! Could you submit the revised drafts soon, even if not perfect, as it’s best to comment on what we’ll be moving forward with than on the (ancient) expired versions. Thanks! If we can get rapid positive feedback that can shortcut the timing to do an adoption call and expeditiously get these on the RG work plan. > We would like to present the updated Chunking draft at IETF 121 Dublin. > Dirk and I will add this to the agenda. in fact these are the first requests for the agenda so we’re hoping more stuff will come in that we can use the meeting time to go through. > Related to FLIC (see links below), I am updating the ccnpy implementation > to the current FLIC draft and ensuring that it works with the CEFORE code. > At some point, I might port the FLIC implementation into CEFORE. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-flic/ > https://github.com/mmosko/ccnpy > https://github.com/cefore/ > Also excellent progress. Thanks! > Marc Mosko > _______________________________________________ > icnrg mailing list -- icnrg@irtf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to icnrg-leave@irtf.org DaveO
- [icnrg] CCNx related drafts Marc Mosko
- [icnrg] Re: CCNx related drafts David R. Oran