[icnrg] Pre-Montreal actions for ICNRG participants

"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Fri, 07 June 2019 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C6412024A for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkrPzrUhj_6t for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C1712024C for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [174.63.80.213] ([IPv6:2601:184:4081:19c1:28c7:e221:4a87:fc8f]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id x57FciTu006646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:38:46 -0700
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 11:38:44 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <EB25435B-B038-4AB9-B4FF-104455FEAF15@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_D251DC56-CA78-42A7-9FFA-CC977C40DE6A_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/NT4vUXp9HTp8lGA2IXmTjJedjss>
Subject: [icnrg] Pre-Montreal actions for ICNRG participants
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:39:05 -0000

Dear ICNRGers,

It’s getting close to meeting again in Montreal in July. There are a 
bunch of things we went over in Prague that need serious attention from 
the RG. The chairs have enumerated these below; please try to make time 
to review and comment on these drafts and give the chairs advice on the 
best way to move our current work plan forward.

When doing reviews and/or responding to this message, please do a 
separate message/thread for each of the drafts we want you to review and 
comment on, and/or weigh in on advice for next steps.

Here goes:

**CCNInfo**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo/
Needs ICNRG review and comment - more eyes on it please!

**Ping & Traceroute**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icnping/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute/
These need to be reviewed in the context of overlap and complementarity 
with CCNInfo. They are relatively mature at this point so what is the 
ICNRG view on RG adoption?

**FLIC draft**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-flic/
This draft has expired, but it is really important for us as Manifests 
are a major part of evolving the ICN architecture.
The Chairs want to strongly encourage some ICNRG folks to pick this up 
and finish it. It doesn’t need a lot of work to complete, at least for 
a version 1 specification.

**ICN LowPAN**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan/
Updates were presented in Prague. The authors and chairs think this is 
getting close to being ready for RG last call. Please review and weigh 
in on whether we should last call this document.

**NRS Documents**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations/
Updates were presented in Prague. These are quite mature at this point 
and the chairs think they are ready for RG Last Call if the ICNRG 
participants think they should be moved forward. Please let us know your 
views on this.

**ICN QoS using Disaggregated Names**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anilj-icnrg-dnc-qos-icn/
This was presented (remotely) in Prague. Please review and comment as 
QoS treatments are a fundamental part of any QoS design for ICN.

**Quality of Service for ICN in the IoT**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gundogan-icnrg-iotqos/
This is a new draft, presented in Prague. Please review and comment.

**Flow Classification in Information Centric Networking**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moiseenko-icnrg-flowclass/
Presented again in Prague. This had some review a while back, but needs 
more. Please indicate if you think this is appropriate for adoption now 
as an RG draft.

**Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture**
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn/
Presented in Prague. Needs review and comment, especially as a potential 
companion to the already-adopted 4G-LTE work.

Your ever-vigilant chairs.
_______________________________________________
icnrg mailing list
icnrg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg