Re: [icnrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04.txt

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de> Sun, 03 November 2019 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3871200F4 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 03:50:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1AeSvqhnEi3O for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 03:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8F8120133 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 03:50:11 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,263,1569276000"; d="scan'208";a="53340341"
Received: from hub02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.24.51]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Nov 2019 12:50:08 +0100
Received: from CAS02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:183d::8d16:183d) by HUB02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:1833::8d16:1833) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:50:08 +0100
Received: from [192.168.178.22] (141.22.250.35) by haw-mailer.haw-hamburg.de (141.22.24.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 12:50:08 +0100
To: "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
References: <3af457ad4de04308b7435bf7c685f6a9@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
Message-ID: <87248a21-458e-13bc-4c90-6e1142b56a55@haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 12:50:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3af457ad4de04308b7435bf7c685f6a9@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [141.22.250.35]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/PNQA7C1hblbjZhsX-GnfFp95eVo>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04.txt
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 11:50:15 -0000

Hi there,

just a formal question: This draft was submitted erroneously as an RG 
document using the URL prefix "draft-irtf-icnrg".

Shouldn't we correct this asap by resubmitting to a URL "draft-auge-icnrg"?

Best,
  Thomas

On 03/11/2019 11:52, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Information-Centric Networking RG of the IRTF.
> 
>          Title           : MAP-Me : Managing Anchorless Mobility in Content Centric Networking
>          Authors         : Jordan Auge
>                            Giovanna Carofiglio
>                            Luca Muscariello
>                            Michele Papalini
> 	Filename        : draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 21
> 	Date            : 2019-11-03
> 
> Abstract:
>     Consumer mobility is supported in ICN by design, in virtue of its
>     connectionless pull-based communication model; producer mobility
>     though is not natively supported.  This document describes MAP-Me, an
>     anchor-less solution to manage micro-mobility of content producers in
>     the CCN (Content Centric Networking) and NDN (Named Data Networking)
>     architectures, with support for latency-sensitive applications.  MAP-
>     Me consists in the combination of two data plane protocols, triggered
>     by producer movements, and leveraging ICN named-based data plane.
>     The main protocol consists in a lightweight FIB update process,
>     complemented by a mechanism of local notification and scoped
>     discovery suitable for low latency applications and fast mobility.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-icnrg-mapme-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
> 

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                  Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group   20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://inet.haw-hamburg.de/members/schmidt      Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °