Re: [icnrg] [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> to Informational RFC

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 03 August 2021 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D643A34C0; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z15UnwAJEWCy; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9153A34BB; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:From:Subject; bh=dtEYT0dU2+p/s/ZlPUznwMgdlCyTqSYGvzECCkjdGnE=; b=XktjvpoULTK2R5OAhBf320WcYY AuD6gE+tUMAfwiYyV4WHisvz1DJs5vqCwgZtVfC34gKjMShgodviGqxyb9Ee4ruJ0KRD5mumAnPEI A+IInHQAav2/iD1PSLu+leUPwdXjZToGDwHBykRDwCrLcxOL8wj5Mh9+iqR7plBOzepSestepWryL uQsTpWnZ1yAv1Eq+J9wEXj/gdlQZR09ge7tYQPL634KPazMJXj9zb3bRqidvbxFOlEC7IJRZP84Am sN48rpF87+4CgZU4Z1dGXtLI6hssCFTjQu7CcvaYDbaDck/2k++o1p27DpyI5fosSnzLqayhnUZW4 0znZgBEQ==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=41461 helo=[192.168.0.83]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1mB2ZS-0006PU-Dy; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 23:07:34 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_055F10EC-C109-4214-8EF8-DEF3CF7CCCBD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <n9zk1c2qdc6r.n9zk1c2n388m.g1@dooray.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:07:29 +0100
Cc: The IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>, draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements@ietf.org, icnrg@irtf.org, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <D600A710-1A01-4BB8-991C-825482A65114@csperkins.org>
References: <162730249046.27943.1429385832999825723@ietfa.amsl.com> <980E4678-9CE2-4B3C-9235-2AD59E07727A@csperkins.org> <n9zk1c2qdc6r.n9zk1c2n388m.g1@dooray.com>
To: Jungha Hong <jhong@etri.re.kr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/QI2jhzw_rW5q8wirf7y61qerag8>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 22:07:44 -0000

Thank you for the update. The changes look okay to me, and are minor. Assuming there are no objections, I’ll send this for IESG conflict review at the end of this week.

Colin



> On 29 Jul 2021, at 07:41, Jungha Hong <jhong@etri.re.kr> wrote:
> 
> Dear Colin,
> 
> I just submitted the updated draft, draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-06 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/>.
> I addressed the comments from Stephen Farrell and Mirja Kuhlewind.
> Please proceed with it.
> 
> 
> @Stephen,
> As I already responded, I removed the word, 'uniquely' from the sentence. 
> 
> @Mirja Kuhlewind,
> The difference between this document and draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations is explained in the 'Introducton' Section as follows:
> "The focus of this document is a Name Resolution Service (NRS) itself as a service or a system in ICN and it provides the functionalities and the design considerations for an NRS in ICN as well as the overview of the NRS approaches in ICN. 
> On the other hand, its companion document describes considerations from the perspective of ICN architecture and routing system when using an NRS
> in ICN."
> In other words, this document describes the NRS in ICN but the other one does ICN architecture.
> I addressed your comments on Section 4.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jungha Hong
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Colin Perkins" <csp@csperkins.org>
> To: "The IRSG" <irsg@irtf.org>rg>;
> Cc: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements@ietf.org>rg>; <icnrg@irtf.org>rg>; <icnrg-chairs@ietf.org>rg>;
> Sent: 2021-07-26 (월) 21:34:06 (UTC+09:00)
> Subject: Re: [irsg] IRSG ballot closed: <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> to Informational RFC
> 
> I’ve closed the IRSG ballot on this draft. 
> 
> Authors, can you please review the comments at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/ballot/irsg/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/ballot/irsg/> and update the draft if necessary (or explain why no updates are needed).
> 
> Thanks,
> Colin
> 
> 
> 
>> On 26 Jul 2021, at 13:28, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org <mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> The IRSG ballot for <draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements-05.txt> has been
>> closed. The evaluation for this document can be found at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/>