Re: [icnrg] New version of icn-pathsteering posted to address comments form IRSG Poll

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 08 August 2023 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AE8C15C523; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xiyUHH-TgOI; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.mythic-beasts.com (mx1.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C822FC15C510; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=t8kZbD4H7Dxd5iF9MysiLqXUR1HG+7aTUySamQxdEHo=; b=Y1CKRbJc6/Gwgl23ifp2llng7y IPcwvPo/Tui5w+5VsHe02DpPMcAjxSOKenlOQfouCxZvGNEgcBex3tahJiq/fDUNe9jJgCmKyek8v XOWuoCUK8OpEWxQUdPedLxFuIZI2H+UYICbnLJO5jrWfuYCb/fSa+xMVo1q63sK1h/JBwMd6Tn2QU JzZnZX4qnV0gwHYNCOYlbhMLzgAvRHS9VBnAJ+c+Ule4F1M8YVcQrENW2H5PYQoOczy9Qh4+IaBDC 7r2KGtPWs0kblAb0WaQVQmoLnOrzGNkM55fDge8/eus4J0Hxf07JkpgWXug/PIk70wNd/hH77f712 VvOw9w/Q==;
Received: by mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1qTUmR-00Cpx0-Rn; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 23:02:20 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
To: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IRSG <irsg@irtf.org>, ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 23:02:11 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5964)
Message-ID: <275A1FE0-0735-472D-953C-DB886EE55277@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <5181EB9F-EF12-42B4-8A44-5BED4EB00521@orandom.net>
References: <5181EB9F-EF12-42B4-8A44-5BED4EB00521@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_310C674D-1C97-43A7-A648-F2162941BB0F_="
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/X1qlUYazp7ERIJ7rZtGnxW3MUgk>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] New version of icn-pathsteering posted to address comments form IRSG Poll
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 22:02:26 -0000

Thanks, Dave.

Spencer - [you had 
comments](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering/ballot/irsg/) 
on the previous version. Can you please check and confirm if this update 
addresses your concerns?

Thanks!
Colin

On 23 Jul 2023, at 12:23, David R. Oran wrote:

> I just posted an update to
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering/
>
> which addresses the comments received during IRSG final poll. There 
> were a couple of comments from Spencer Dawkins which did not result in 
> any changes, so it would be helpful if Spencer could take a quick look 
> at the attached email I sent a while back to make sure he’s ok with 
> the author responses.
>
> If everybody’s ok with this version, it should be ready to move to 
> IESG conflict review.
>
> DaveO