Re: [icnrg] RG adoption of draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute

Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> Wed, 18 March 2020 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@dkutscher.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55133A1ADC for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56Uc6K0wqvTb for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9543A193B for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.56.1] ([77.21.26.148]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue107 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N0F9t-1jSj4j1eHX-00xMQe for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:07:42 +0100
From: "Dirk Kutscher" <ietf@dkutscher.net>
To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:07:41 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <C353EAE6-51BB-41E7-8D6E-FADF3B51B0F6@dkutscher.net>
In-Reply-To: <5F3D43C6-7CCE-43CC-84CA-C0B1E6F21390@dkutscher.net>
References: <5F3D43C6-7CCE-43CC-84CA-C0B1E6F21390@dkutscher.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:mo81eU46P5YZNuhsJP498Xa3teLJwFpYoStPgpcurTC0AFNXo6t 43xos5W2SGU3w1V7lONAvwFlwo81j21sfiQ9+yqJbXw4af+PYEkxietSm0b0e4JbGTX1ssx iTehwKfuB0CS6+vZKwyuFfqbxNEVE//M1G9MciCL3J42kC3pZLTYz2wt9gK3A/Gy2+dBexL tqIMlGnQ7Tr27VQWdrbow==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AEfPxfeOcqM=:4EA60c0WNU7yNTViUzgsXb Oa/3YufzAmqTIv5G3kpFLCiuV2jHiWMwDOdIamKrlES2L1qhXMaCN211zALr+BJC23jKc2hME BbkH3kv7rAlaQO5+IZJvx/4G6mAwuf7cuZfYVuwqlTse1QJaT9Mt772MOAuq4uJ1HPL88gQo6 PdO2zEx+0kUnHCYxc0Rgpl4OF/HQ3lKfcA4opNXNQrX/w6bnHZPX9R5pdncbPHHckVusfl1U4 c/g361UQYmsIb+dXLjd8HxjupyGki3NklIaRjbBR6pbrlWIqouHHE2EljVy++t0p/lnWSVT++ JavzGnnmB5fM1qywttOcar3xh/opG8WFpdJq0MMkV9MZWSecKMMicejGVIjTzi9uPrdaH9tAk OFoZ8SaVLyCMqrXdlX1lWSnJr210wOOZnbzBu5ZQiPxKcQix2yE/nlS3VGP1psNSUjc5i72hE VwSWbOBUU5JWZeU2hFlTu7NsRA7PfZQU1T6TksA7LeILHvI99CxOTROviZb0I2usciViUpuHL FwSvLmwqqsDWorRwAxC7TxsAMy/Sx6rddBzJBtJUAIk/TcDHYQLjyCwN2eMlQG10hAyWUONOm lnkkSf0ANptfOg/zM2JC0kuEMwWfYNri5rfv5tUy3drG0FQO5Eae67ayDzzFj0aZgBkrXW0Rx J1TX6LUkLV23vVMdsENbWgFSdgJNzMAjFUvqURsdw7oEKHLjPDzIjza34/am+7o0pmq/6VGQx etfE3KaJiLda/zvzguJ6wq/ltbWPGvbb/ZP9YwopFDaIjrlMIZ0naToQipS/lozwFywTjFWcT bvSn/Q4/U8YTRTjSHR1o4S0RqMzDgr1fl7Q6xwV7zHmUwaGZV9j18ps95EeBJ6VoGzYlwFH
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/Xq9TvT6oi1pBQHNYZQlyYIDQJQA>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] RG adoption of draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:08:08 -0000

Hello ICNRG,

we haven not heard about any concerns, and given the interest at 
previous meetings, we are adopting this draft as a RG item.

Authors, please submit a new version as draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute 
at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
ICNRG chairs
Dave and Dirk



On 19 Feb 2020, at 10:57, Dirk Kutscher wrote:

> Hello ICNRG,
>
> The ICN trace route specification has been around for some time. 
> It’s one of the useful (potentially) needed management/debugging 
> tools for ICN networks, so the chairs think there is merit in 
> publishing the document as an Experimental RFC at some point.
>
> At this time, we would like to ask the group for feedback on the 
> proposal of adopting this draft as a RG item.
>
> Just as a reminder, RG adoption means that the specification will be 
> progressed as an activity within ICNRG and that the authors would edit 
> the document on behalf of the RG.
>
> Adoption in an IRTF RG context does not mean that this is the only 
> (ICNRG-endorsed…) way of (here:) ascertaining path characteristics 
> in ICN . There could be other proposal that might be adopted as well 
> (if perceived useful).
>
> The draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute/
>
> Abstract:
> This document presents the design of an ICN Traceroute protocol.
> This includes the operations both on the client and the forwarder 
> side.
>
> Best regards,
> Dirk and Börje (as managing co-chairs)
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg