Re: [icnrg] Pre-Montreal actions for ICNRG participants

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> Mon, 10 June 2019 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E62120125 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKgMjOjZXWRv for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E2A1200C1 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id t16so4328589pfe.11 for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qaPIlA2elcC2pVVJmkLx0C0MQ5hqxhTEVLm7iQTqVLo=; b=USNw6N9tNwZwoZFBLsB0gGjX+3SZiVKBqT1cTOxxxA+rUWmTgXLVNYI5z4FCvaSJdA 6xsnSL1bC2YADlBtpPjlgbvclksSftYiR2GOxEeoqkZ1PGuAyQz4q6ex7fgt0jwczdAS /oc+7u7N9yLMyV6R2/4YJZXsVRwV9AwbpVzVA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qaPIlA2elcC2pVVJmkLx0C0MQ5hqxhTEVLm7iQTqVLo=; b=M9M/oK8Vy4dokFf3/etKdKM2gKn/k8b1jngFCNsujWa8jCMEcrVa1XlgCObSBuNvlX 7Psi5O9TGX3lDvJz7bXHAMK/L/KNU0P7elgknwOuxBRTZA8TZQw9OKnX8qPX3JjvC71A F3Loig6QoPp+ZpyzuH76ueO/Oq15OAvZdLynOOFUeLZvONDZ0rdihhKR1BUUmT3pbS45 /Cebw6lvCo7icguQPgTQu0Vx2GW+gktgjPHOX3wVQ7ESU+pCsPjZ97EtjtXnpbJmlp0X Ciik5sBnTRf3LbbMmyjsAiMF02qfhlBYAzRqqYCe3SuMQzcxOys1nr3suPjbjsjouS2y CSPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGtCKdrTP5ede0fikMz0sNLboIejRVBxZGXtIU58zRxjRZhCPh o4trO9cuRyBd/Vi6iD62CrILxDXifRI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrfVJTsZwEr65ELcOEzMCaLInaFXU5hoU5muXFO/GhsIUMz8rNcyHwyLFKG53GFtAxOPXKGA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f953:: with SMTP id q19mr11056621pgk.367.1560133369399; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.250.176.26] ([210.160.37.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s17sm7967764pfm.74.2019.06.09.19.22.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Jun 2019 19:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <EB25435B-B038-4AB9-B4FF-104455FEAF15@orandom.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:22:46 +0900
Cc: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <21BF0AAE-E7EE-437F-904D-F753B6623C25@ieee.org>
References: <EB25435B-B038-4AB9-B4FF-104455FEAF15@orandom.net>
To: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/Xs8Y9A04Q7hYk8ec4pDNBjJKE4g>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Pre-Montreal actions for ICNRG participants
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:22:52 -0000

Hi Dave and folks,

Thank you for your remark.

> CCNInfo
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo/
> Needs ICNRG review and comment - more eyes on it please!


We'll update this draft with your previous comments before the deadline for the upcoming meeting.
But if you folks have other comments, it's also good to tell us before the deadline.

BTW, I'm sorry but I won't be able to join the Sunday meeting so that I may want to ask a presentation slot for this draft in the regular meeting.

Thanks for your attention.

Regards,

Hitoshi


> On Jun 8, 2019, at 0:38, David R. Oran <daveoran@orandom.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear ICNRGers,
> 
> It’s getting close to meeting again in Montreal in July. There are a bunch of things we went over in Prague that need serious attention from the RG. The chairs have enumerated these below; please try to make time to review and comment on these drafts and give the chairs advice on the best way to move our current work plan forward.
> 
> When doing reviews and/or responding to this message, please do a separate message/thread for each of the drafts we want you to review and comment on, and/or weigh in on advice for next steps.
> 
> Here goes:
> 
> CCNInfo
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo/
> Needs ICNRG review and comment - more eyes on it please!
> 
> Ping & Traceroute
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icnping/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mastorakis-icnrg-icntraceroute/
> These need to be reviewed in the context of overlap and complementarity with CCNInfo. They are relatively mature at this point so what is the ICNRG view on RG adoption?
> 
> FLIC draft
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-flic/
> This draft has expired, but it is really important for us as Manifests are a major part of evolving the ICN architecture.
> The Chairs want to strongly encourage some ICNRG folks to pick this up and finish it. It doesn’t need a lot of work to complete, at least for a version 1 specification.
> 
> ICN LowPAN
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan/
> Updates were presented in Prague. The authors and chairs think this is getting close to being ready for RG last call. Please review and weigh in on whether we should last call this document.
> 
> NRS Documents
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations/
> Updates were presented in Prague. These are quite mature at this point and the chairs think they are ready for RG Last Call if the ICNRG participants think they should be moved forward. Please let us know your views on this.
> 
> ICN QoS using Disaggregated Names
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anilj-icnrg-dnc-qos-icn/
> This was presented (remotely) in Prague. Please review and comment as QoS treatments are a fundamental part of any QoS design for ICN.
> 
> Quality of Service for ICN in the IoT
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gundogan-icnrg-iotqos/
> This is a new draft, presented in Prague. Please review and comment.
> 
> Flow Classification in Information Centric Networking
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moiseenko-icnrg-flowclass/
> Presented again in Prague. This had some review a while back, but needs more. Please indicate if you think this is appropriate for adoption now as an RG draft.
> 
> Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn/
> Presented in Prague. Needs review and comment, especially as a potential companion to the already-adopted 4G-LTE work.
> 
> Your ever-vigilant chairs.
> 
> <Mail Attachment.txt>_______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg