Re: [icnrg] Possible adoption of "Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core Architecture" (draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-04)

Thanks Cedric, we will address the corrections in the next review.

Regards
Ravi

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, 11:18 Cedric Westphal <cedric.westphal@futurewei.com
wrote:

> Hi Dirk,
>
>
>
> I support adoption of this draft. It is a very interesting discussion on
> how to enable ICN over the 5G architecture.
>
>
>
> A couple editorial comments:
>
>    - “where 5G technology is considered as one of the promising
>    alternatives.” -> alternative to what?
>    - “realtime” -> real time or real-time
>    - “application- bound identifier and name resolution split principle
>    considered for the ICN is shown to handle host mobility quite efficiently”
>    -> unclear sentence. Maybe: “ICN uses a split between the application
>    identifier and the name resolution that is known to handle host mobility
>    efficiently”
>    - “design principals” -> “design principles”
>    - “utilize API design” -> “an API design”
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> C.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Dirk Kutscher* <ietf@dkutscher.net>
> Date: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:36 AM
> Subject: [icnrg] Possible adoption of "Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen
> Core Architecture" (draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn-04)
> To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
>
>
>
> Hi ICNRG,
>
> At the ICNRG meeting at IETF-105 in Montreal, we discussed the possible
> adoption of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn/
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ravi-icnrg-5gc-icn%2F&data=02%7C01%7Ccedric.westphal%40futurewei.com%7C1278917ce119463ea73a08d73c5fa868%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637044253849499323&sdata=y6MacrSUa056iZsRKSGr5O3t%2BqDRdY31fgGR4ECr0aE%3D&reserved=0>
> .
>
> During the meeting, no objection was raised, but not many people had
> read the latest version of the draft. As usual, we would like to follow
> up on the mailing list, so we are looking for statements indicating
> support for adoption or concerns against it from people who are 1) not
> co-authors and 2) have read the latest version.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irtf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ficnrg&data=02%7C01%7Ccedric.westphal%40futurewei.com%7C1278917ce119463ea73a08d73c5fa868%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637044253849499323&sdata=vaqzel4d%2BDaViQaXlm5LsUCXhcA8HpqUBI3KGzA4IOM%3D&reserved=0>
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
>