Re: [icnrg] Status from Chairs and actions for the ICNRG participants in preparation for Interim meeting on April 20

["David R. Oran" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the note - sorry I missed this on my email.
ICNRG folks - please review the latest draft!


On 26 Mar 2020, at 4:57, Milheiro Mendes, Paulo Jorge wrote:

> Hi David, Dirk,
>
> It seems that you forgot the Dabber draft in the list of active 
> individual
> contributions:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mendes-icnrg-dabber/
>
> This draft is listed in the ICNRG datatracker documents web page.
>
> The draft is now on v4, and we will start its implementation after 
> revising
> the spec once more.. Being the only proposal for an ICN routing 
> protocol
> for wireless opportunistic networks, I would appreciate if this draft 
> is
> added to the list of individual drafts that may be adopted as ICNRG 
> working
> draft.
>
> Cheers
> Paulo
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 2:47 PM David R. Oran <[e-mail]> 
> wrote:
>
>> While the COVID19 situation is upon us, we wish everybody health and
>> safety. It is incumbent on us, however, to point out that you may now 
>> have
>> more quality time for ICNRG work, and we would certainly appreciate 
>> any
>> effort you can put in to advance our relatively large active work 
>> plan.
>> First, some status updates:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Börje Ohlman, who has been our co-chair since the inception of 
>> ICNRG,
>>    has decided to step down as his group’s focus at Ericsson 
>> Research has
>>    vectored into other areas. Dirk and I offer our eternal thanks for 
>> the
>>    great job Börje has done over the years, and wish him the best. 
>> Hopefully,
>>    he will still be around the IRTF/IETF and he’ll be able to apply 
>> his steady
>>    hand to some exciting new work. Dirk Kutscher and Dave Oran plan 
>> to
>>    continue indefinitely, and hopefully we will be able to keep up 
>> with the
>>    load and be responsive to the needs of ICNRG going forward.
>>    -
>>
>>    The NRS documents (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrs-requirements/
>>    and
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-nrsarch-considerations/),
>>    having successfully passed last call and been updated from last 
>> call
>>    comments. They are in the hands of the IRTF chair to start the 
>> IRSG review
>>    cycle.
>>    -
>>
>>    We have adopted two important management documents as ICNRG work
>>    items. Please review the new RG official versions that have just 
>> been
>>    posted:
>>    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icnping/
>>       - 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute/
>>    -
>>
>>    A number of documents are in active RFC editor processing for
>>    publication:
>>    -
>>       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-deployment-guidelines/
>>       - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-disaster/
>>       - 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology/
>>    -
>>
>>    The chairs decided “Considerations in the development of a QoS
>>    Architecture for CCNx-like ICN protocols” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-qosarch/) should 
>> be
>>    published as an individual contribution and hence will be sent to 
>> the IRSG
>>    for review, bypassing formal RG last call.
>>    -
>>
>>    “Native Deployment of ICN in LTE, 4G Mobile Networks” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icn-lte-4g/)
>>    finished IRSG review and has some comments from the IRTF chair 
>> that need to
>>    be addressed. Once that’s done we should be able to send that on 
>> to the RFC
>>    editor for publication.
>>    -
>>
>>    “ICN Adaptation to LowPAN Networks (ICN LoWPAN)” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-icnlowpan/) has
>>    gotten wide support and we will be issuing an RG Last Call for it 
>> in the
>>    coming days. Please look for the last call announcement and 
>> *re-review*
>>    this important document.
>>    -
>>
>>    The IP-over-ICN document (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ipoc/) is ready 
>> for
>>    ICNRG Last Call. Look for the announcement later today or 
>> tomorrow.
>>
>> Second, please take time to review the these active RG documents
>>
>> We hope to move them forward toward last call if appropriate, and 
>> have
>> scheduled time to discuss updates at the Interim meeting on April 20.
>>
>>    - We recently adopted “Enabling ICN in 3GPP's 5G NextGen Core
>>    Architecture” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-5gc-icn/) as an
>>    ICNRG working draft. *Please review* so we can discuss moving this
>>    forward.
>>
>> Third, please take time to review the these active individual
>> contributions and weigh in on whether they should be adopted as ICNRG
>> working drafts.
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    QoS Treatments in ICN using Disaggregated Name Components (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anilj-icnrg-dnc-qos-icn/) 
>> needs
>>    wider review. Only DaveO has provided any review so far.
>>    -
>>
>>    “Internet Services over ICN in 5G LAN Environments” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trossen-icnrg-internet-icn-5glan/)
>>    *needs review*.
>>    -
>>
>>    “Path Steering in CCNx and NDN” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-pathsteering/) 
>> *needs
>>    review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working 
>> draft*
>>    .
>>    -
>>
>>    “Maintaining CCNx or NDN flow balance with highly variable data 
>> object
>>    sizes” 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-oran-icnrg-flowbalance/)
>>    *needs review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG
>>    working draft*.
>>    -
>>
>>    “Flow Classification in Information Centric Networking” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moiseenko-icnrg-flowclass/) 
>> *needs
>>    review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working 
>> draft*
>>    .
>>    -
>>
>>    “Hop-by-Hop Authentication in Content-Centric Networking/Named 
>> Data
>>    Networking” 
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-icnrg-hopauth/) *needs
>>    review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working 
>> draft*
>>    .
>>    -
>>
>>    “An Alternative Delta Time encoding for CCNx using Interval Time 
>> from
>>    RFC5497” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gundogan-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv/) 
>> *needs
>>    review and assessment of suitability to adopt as an ICNRG working 
>> draft*
>>    .
>>    -
>>
>>    “Requirements and Challenges for User-level Service Managements 
>> of IoT
>>    Network by utilizing Artificial Intelligence” (
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-choi-icnrg-aiot/) *needs
>>    initial review*.
>>
>> Fourth, we have started planning logistics and agenda for our Interim
>> virtual meeting on April 20.
>>
>> So, please *propose agenda items*, consider *giving a talk* on one of 
>> the
>> discussion topic areas identified for the interim meeting, and 
>> *register
>> for the interim as customary* (by editing the Wiki page at
>> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/irtf/wiki/icnrg).
>>
>> Thanks for not treating this as TL;DR and actually getting to the 
>> end!!
>>
>> Your ever-vigilant Chairs, Dirk and DaveO.
>> _______________________________________________
>> icnrg mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> *Paulo Mendes, Ph.D*
>
> Senior Scientistic Wireless Communications
>
> Central Research and Technology, XRC
>
> *Airbus*
> The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not 
> be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to 
> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus 
> immediately and delete this e-mail.
> Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or 
> completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. 
> If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its 
> Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
> All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated 
> virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem 
> to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are 
> virus free.



DaveO