From csp@csperkins.org Fri Sep 29 03:49:57 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C06C151719 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:49:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.408 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9m9ciJTIKU6V for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.mythic-beasts.com (mx1.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DCEC14CEED for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=Date:Subject:To:From; bh=ncFjgQMN4OGFrxrqDj1QQaeJwTGUWL7LyZ96ROh1qMA=; b=HYM6IWAPN/+SpPGoaRpZzWdYEt gYyFFTYYm8cseSciNuuYhmesdHA5c7MPPiocstrPuZ8jlQP8K5uBsPMcdxC2kZPF8nrjr3TawcbGD 6HPH8+glVjB/NGxdBAqdCb7aCCjCuRkP2BNyQ8Qf24jNhGBN88PQgSjIbYYmnaBQc+qh1sP9evMGa jGXlfUigmeJsi7/KNRfYoRl1uoajffbDKzAyKOZns4aZXNm0n7NfTmu6gJ+42byd4XIaXfCAuY5xo 9SREppy5RMiWOShhafQhmYo3HXd7HVZe8mQpy0DAycwefsCkuHhO+uP29OWhR4ZfAg/cZBv6lAHLX TF5JZv9A==; Received: by mailhub-cam-d.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmB49-003vEw-Cl; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:49:49 +0100 From: Colin Perkins To: Hitoshi Asaeda Cc: drafts-expert-review@iana.org, icnrg@irtf.org Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:46:54 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5964) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4E3C2214-C2DF-431D-8B48-9DEFB9950C9F@nict.go.jp> References: <50A22A97-206E-4E3E-BD30-35BF8C6DD85A@nict.go.jp> <4E3C2214-C2DF-431D-8B48-9DEFB9950C9F@nict.go.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 24 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [icnrg] [IANA #1280061] expert review for draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering (ccnx) X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:49:57 -0000 On 29 Sep 2023, at 6:16, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote: > Hi Amanda and all, > > I've reviewed the revised draft. > I confirmed all of my comments were addressed. > > One minor point is that this document requests assigning the value 0xA = (if available) for the T_RETURN_INVALID_PATH_LABEL, but "0xA" should be "= 0x0A". > I believe it will be corrected whenever this document enters AUTH48, th= ough. Is this worth spinning a quick update to make sure it doesn't get forgott= en? Colin