Return-Path: X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923B33A0C2C for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psBIEfbdvzJs for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.netlab.uky.edu (wonder.netlab.uky.edu [128.163.140.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FCE3A0E77 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.73.191] (cpe-96-29-182-38.kya.res.rr.com [96.29.182.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.netlab.uky.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A0231FF51; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:16:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Ken Calvert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\)) Message-Id: <34552F76-578B-43C6-BBF3-54930DD2DE1F@netlab.uky.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:16:34 -0400 Cc: icnrg@irtf.org To: "David R. Oran" , Dirk Kutscher X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5) Archived-At: Subject: [icnrg] Comments on reflexive draft X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 15:16:46 -0000 Gents - Overall it reads really well and does a great motivating the = proposal. And obviously feel free to ignore any suggestions. 1. Introduction 6th paragraph: "built on top of on reliable" [delete 2nd "on"] 3. Overview of the Reflexive Forwarding Design Bullet 1. ("The Reflexive Interest needs..."): "This name is what the = originating consumer will use to match against the Data object ... it = wishes the producer to fetch..." I found this construction a bit = confusing; suggest something like "this name (or an extension) will = refer to the Data object(s) the originating consumer prepares to send to = the producer..." That also avoids the anthropomorphism ("wishes"). Bullet 2. ("There has to be a FIB..."): Suggest "At each forwarder = along the path from producer to consumer, a FIB entry must match (LNPM) = this name...". Also "deign" -> design, later in the paragraph. Bullet 3. ("There has to be coupling...") "...this accomplished by the = way..." -> this is accomplished by the way 4. Naming of Reflexive Interests 1st paragraph: "...enough information in their initial Interest" -> = enough information in its initial Interest Also, "...enough state must be provided by the consumer..." - I found = this a bit confusing. The forwarder creates the state, from info = provided by the consumer. Suggest "enough information must be available = for the forwarders to construct a FIB entry...", or just change "state" = to "information". [I have some additional thoughts about the content of this section, but = will send them separately.] 7.1 Achieving Remote Method ... 2nd paragraph: "computating" -> computing 8.1.2 Interactions with Interest Lifetime 4th paragraph: "...a reflexive Interest arrives from upstream matching = the..." - suggest deleting "from upstream", it's not clearly defined and = doesn't seem necessary. last paragraph: "While the above approach..." - this sentence is = garbled, the first clause seems to be missing a predicate. last sentence: "Interest-Datsa exchange" -> Interest-Data exchange Cheers, Ken