Re: [icnrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-07.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Sun, 25 July 2021 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3F13A0BFD for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsuMXaLqVur8 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F2A3A0BFC for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=pcQoZyjQdmetc1grn85VL4O0Yb967JH8b3tCGI7moqU=; b=Fs8hyDT9oWR1y6mhGMdYmaelmD /ytHlMrh7HnV/vMu5KOMdfMyz8bhMhBhIZs6ii72qK3RoAxP3nai/XD1t96W3/s9wt6NSHgUfrld5 LN+2wgE2xdjJZ5y7K1c8lnxFeTacHjcHqmvCk+fUkp5gbdhyZ7oyZbJzNNlbjIAQr7gdSATcsXHHj kys0uzrQJIG1op42p1QDhuWcL/TB/Z5gQIJ6FaUBN6/at/B3Ih5DKQ8+K/E6riSE1eRw4F55yQKmV miYMZxYnu6PocWBkiNdc5PZ0kNPd7R3CTwpT88pdunajsGkRtiYgayv9MF9Al6Qe2W7KfNKUfjXF3 ZLq3UgRA==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=37410 helo=[192.168.0.83]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1m7mi8-00005j-35 for icnrg@irtf.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:35:08 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:35:02 +0100
References: <162609991640.30338.3256491230966541903@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: icnrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <162609991640.30338.3256491230966541903@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <9576CA63-C6EB-425E-8A40-81A9EB9B848A@csperkins.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/hI7pq3VfI9Oq2BtZN_VjKpvrALk>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-07.txt
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 22:35:15 -0000

Hi,

Thanks for updating this – I’ve reviewed the changes, and they address the issues I raised at IETF 110. I do, however, have two comments on this latest version:

1. This version of the draft does a good job of motivating how this helps with experiments, but it might be useful to add a sentence to the Abstract saying something like “CCNinfo is useful to understand and debug the behaviour of testbed networks and other experimental deployments of CCN systems”, to make this even clearer.

2. Section 2.1 of RFC 5743 requires all IRTF drafts to contain a statement in the Abstract identifying the drafts as a product of an IRTF RG (“This memo is a product of the IRTF Information-Centric Networking Research Group”) and some text in the Introduction stating the level of support for the publication and the extent of review received (probably something similar to “This memo represents the consensus view of the IRTF Information-Centric Networking Research Group. It has received review by…”). Could you please add these statements?

Thanks,
Colin




> On 12 Jul 2021, at 15:25, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Information-Centric Networking RG of the IRTF.
> 
>        Title           : CCNinfo: Discovering Content and Network Information in Content-Centric Networks
>        Authors         : Hitoshi Asaeda
>                          Atsushi Ooka
>                          Xun Shao
> 	Filename        : draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 37
> 	Date            : 2021-07-12
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document describes a mechanism named "CCNinfo" that discovers
>   information about the network topology and in-network cache in
>   Content-Centric Networks (CCN).  CCNinfo investigates: 1) the CCN
>   routing path information per name prefix, 2) the Round-Trip Time
>   (RTT) between the content forwarder and consumer, and 3) the states
>   of in-network cache per name prefix.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-icnrg-ccninfo-07
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> icnrg mailing list
> icnrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/