[icnrg] Progression of the CCNInfo work

"David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net> Fri, 02 August 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6C21202C3 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 07:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nfv44m1fupst for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 07:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spark.crystalorb.net (spark.crystalorb.net [IPv6:2607:fca8:1530::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFCF1202AA for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 07:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ([IPv6:2601:184:4081:19c1:5d74:cc89:3503:46cf]) (authenticated bits=0) by spark.crystalorb.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id x72EVo9C020741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 07:31:52 -0700
From: "David R. Oran" <daveoran@orandom.net>
To: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:31:49 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5643)
Message-ID: <F30E219B-5794-46F9-B3C1-5B7AC393E19F@orandom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_7744D786-9AC0-4060-B714-767227A45839_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/rQRs1GHEiTfiJG0rr2hW4pkUivk>
Subject: [icnrg] Progression of the CCNInfo work
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:31:55 -0000

<Chair Hat On>

The -02 version of this work was submitted and presented at the recent 
ICNRG meeting. I sent  individual comments on the draft today to the 
list, which, among other things, assessed it as pretty mature at this 

Given the importance of having management capabilities for CCNx-based 
ICN deployments, ICNRG needs to devote resources to moving this work 
(and other work like Ping and Traceroute) forward expeditiously.

While my personal assessment is that the draft is reasonably close to 
being ready for RG last call, there have not been **nearly** enough eyes 
on it to feel confident that it’s something we want to push toward to 
experimental RFC.

I would like to ask *please* for some volunteers to read the draft and 
send comments. Perhaps you need some beach or mountain reading for 
August break :-) ?

You can find it at:

Many thanks.