IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: id-event@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F5E130ECD for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FeUwcQPJhUdj for <id-event@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D9512D826 for <id-event@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id w6so15387060ljd.7 for <id-event@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l/rzLvAf1ZZkP2K1aRGrmisdl6tkrPwGJo1nPb1/qNQ=; b=YuHIRq9gZxZiwsglIsHKM5VKJteL4uVa4Sfrh6OEZVmziyLvphwC0OIR3SAZwc45vN lYdZUB3sptpWNoofNKTOgZhaADTOyP8RmyhlbM+ZhmXr0pq6uKD+zJOeXDAjjC7yApz6 ca9oWW2GO8MEyGtnRx03i8g9yP0MEwDstzEOTOen322kQxSYbV8708zMl8IzxoBaGw8f UcTDQxfYVbG8o7hylCRySA2/J6pqHxyZmOx8wZ3/HLo09OePdoaOQATS9zr2C/eGubU5 ARWjilf+DuGo+7vzVCQcmHj50lkQaB78iy1VmLo8BrVGsE6KnPUMV1TuxBHQ2gOXmcNZ gBtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l/rzLvAf1ZZkP2K1aRGrmisdl6tkrPwGJo1nPb1/qNQ=; b=KVRgJxFSOI6d8nM8tiLFYSS2aiODzMh1czZm2RBUnv01lNFR2pyLQIUAdi+AOGsdWF rBFL3hENzd/gHOQeeRng0FGQ5B+bHfwDvEAdzCmyLxm2lD2lzjPe1Mskgg2HcCzpVaxY mKToPmfYjWbtr5OKp1m6FsvQCPLgQmRX4gLNmqW5Ai7sOrUyi5rqFb197fxomc76gYSu qYZb++t5rULd1irVkZZbUL/Ze2TDfxTtc0nyKI+PS3Lpl+4w5jC1W+L3cBT4/qSO6pC6 MyBXquyUmc25aoQGit2qbG8pvq+zzxbnWOtktx/raFCKPpZt8IuyjpyxFE669pF6SgDy hINQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXv9GyTVApXqzNVqZmPcHaBW/4lNC8PeeoA8RYr//eooi6oGYNh aEMQvF3+PuyT3GDyNKgaOAQhxg8fLwOV8MVZBKQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQkP2ASPnv02atBeBNqQ/93huQM4NmkHdnSO5doEGQnVzR2rFm7x10+JBnRct7jSsvMrutpe7vBY3BC4iwP9c=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:63c3:: with SMTP id s64mr2961334lje.121.1551308294261; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7cfedb70-a999-ad63-efd0-56a178adde97@gmail.com> <CABpvcNs69NZeqXmNui6poP79R6q40WgEAT7jRkvb_vTL_Y8x=A@mail.gmail.com> <CABpvcNuZEvjwcsZjJP9gDtReRBAmeFM41b1O7uXzD=UCSasEZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABpvcNuZEvjwcsZjJP9gDtReRBAmeFM41b1O7uXzD=UCSasEZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:58:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-tSiuC8YRiJfwEAOb9H1RDWc7yd+wxA3fxWjA6-1nw_hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marius Scurtescu <marius.scurtescu=40coinbase.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, SecEvent <id-event@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1129a0582e81ba2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/id-event/iuzJBy_3A8IgtvvXM5suCvd8_3s>
Subject: Re: [Id-event] Push draft: conclusion of WGLC
X-BeenThere: id-event@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A mailing list to discuss the potential solution for a common identity event messaging format and distribution system." <id-event.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/id-event/>
List-Post: <mailto:id-event@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event>, <mailto:id-event-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:58:20 -0000

Hi Marius

Per my other response, implementations are important, but do not represent
rough consensus.

Yaron and I have reached out the the AD to get guidance on how to proceed.

There is low energy in the WG, the implication is that the WG may be ready
to terminate.



On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:42 PM Marius Scurtescu <marius.scurtescu=
40coinbase.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Any chance for an answer from the chairs to the 3 questions below?
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:52 PM Marius Scurtescu <
> marius.scurtescu@coinbase.com> wrote:
>
>> Regrettable indeed :-(
>>
>> Were the recent official launches by Adobe and Google taken into
>> consideration?
>>
>> Is it possible to consult the AD for options?
>>
>> Did we consider the implications for the whole working group?
>>
>> While the group is indeed at a low point of activity, a lot of work went
>> into this draft and it is central for real life implementations.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:43 AM Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear working group,
>>>
>>> We issued a 2-week second last call for draft-ietf-secevent-http-push-04
>>> on Jan. 24, and extended it by a further week, which expired on Friday. We
>>> had to issue a second last call because of lack of response to the first
>>> last call which took place in November/December.
>>>
>>> The results were better in the second try (2 non-authors in support, and
>>> 1 not clearly supporting publication) but not enough in our mind to push
>>> the document forward.
>>>
>>> This means that we will not be publishing the Push protocol as a working
>>> group document. The authors are welcome to publish it through other
>>> channels, as an AD-sposored RFC or through the ISE.
>>>
>>> We regret that we have reached this impasse, but clearly there is too
>>> little energy within the working group. We thank the authors for the
>>> significant effort that they put into this document, and thank the working
>>> group members who reviewed it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>     Dick and Yaron
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Id-event mailing list
>>> Id-event@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Id-event mailing list
> Id-event@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/id-event
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email