Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF691342C2 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssjIXZZaCsST for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAC7126B6D for <ideas@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id o52so8528849qtc.9 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VrfzaZkX+cF6//RCQiTavZmTiqhyUZvTyJZwzITsflg=; b=wg6AvbhcUHhTdJasXNOPIMMmwTeVMMVwNaV8OjZf94qZNqElmNvIZGHLdC/2YGJZVi DujcW4OJLF59Yk6+5CRWLYJqw1lPMz9iFJCPRnexBcgRTdAzQUgip/p7npxR+kd1GsCW JCXXemp00x2vgikC/gnSF1kXFbp6ZUnLA3jKCZezBu9LQJJknoOpZNa1KxxVcdlz8SNa 5v+Pgkqwyyfn7ia2dlu8XWZQ/a50dq5Tf8vhcDELuEmwihqR13eJpLiGGtTjbsfVFvHn LWzQY00nwF2mZO3NGF++irwzP/F+9gTttDtKFO2uUaBolrYFBi6kt7qgqc+0xvnSkVzr tAyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VrfzaZkX+cF6//RCQiTavZmTiqhyUZvTyJZwzITsflg=; b=NRtaCLsvFQzwmkaVXkUQHgIjNsYgBlo5sgX04Gi1DKgAU+NLqrG4YcepiKinF7RCW4 CCxAT82ZQZ6KUaAi2AesR1PQNERuyD6M/JLaDQeMVDnBt7Xa6NIdSUy7l1J8Y7DbYpQ6 CCrsCmiKhvCWsQxazifXCUv2I7x3yjQwvQu3l9lX6KJa/veUUai7d9VW8aJE7KE5SN4a 8ujtgO7bjXot/zzhXvyEhcsJ5sd9oST3uYKXaNVG+6w0kOitAfU4aYh0/uHeKrTjNp1B ddrFVnCES5IEiKVWHFrl9teIaUjLV204fz0rInbj/AcxgdSzEFPaRg8jh63O5XJVm8bk fIPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVMcYTbFSHJxWoZ68PCbzrDFeYVnmCyD1tuo/2ghYpVqYMxkK2j H5/KM0S5kcmBJIq2W8KwiHT67uAYDGRLvRF9Cf7aJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QACicXA5WEHEG7BTSmv5VRXrLdLTET9waKl50yCHhbnnuRJxK29fDaeXanY4PEo5Dfnz1lj9YC36jCGudsDEY4=
X-Received: by 10.37.51.68 with SMTP id z65mr394104ybz.353.1507749682817; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.75.194 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <47ABE650-B83D-4400-B27C-C0E5F1C8BA13@gmail.com>
References: <150773363527.24819.15137383317907133805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <47ABE650-B83D-4400-B27C-C0E5F1C8BA13@gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:20:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMG+OyYv1Kaeb1BeuUX_Tc3yz8TYObtv7JTVteSuY35Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, ideas@ietf.org, ideas-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148aa624142ab055b4a54c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/-ptsr0gz6ITXtoBffRmkheZapyk>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:28:14 -0000

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> (1) The work is insufficiently motivated. The claims about the need for the
> mapping system and the identity management system envisioned here do not
> appear
> to be backed up by those who have developed and deployed ID/LOC separation
> protocols. Nor do there seem to be compelling arguments that the framework
> that
> this proposed WG would produce would be the motivator for further
> interoperable
> deployments.
>
>
> This is simply not true. The IETF mailing lists are not finding the reach
> of interest that exists in the industry
>

Be that as it may, the determination of consensus and justification has to
be made primarily on what appears on the mailing lists and at meetings.

-Ekr


> Dino
>
>