IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B4C12B21C; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Ot8WQTz6Fdz; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853DE12B22B; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id oz2so30090134pac.2; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=69uVCUkYxgw7mAuMRPRq8wjsLhrTMtfbGXDtVl28L1Q=; b=gREu4tm0eZC8Fkt/GRcQJYx24UJqsxndm7H/hqm3UIkueEHDJxgBYURlvAr/TKZHXi nu9HFadWMOLDP8P8u1msD59vGrCOiOdiRIO/zSzekcDiQfoeKuh6dtXkzfv9sol5R1Nc ipbJDk1qJI/go4SyXnTJYdMmt+KLF1Q1qogOnTyg9VoZRnAw2u9XAHoafeUcW8A+XxHd t+yKGEz/sotQ/1Ih84Al/XPstkLSSHl5IljKbxZXz5N2ofLBc0OukXjt6j0vSG+K7qcY OmtySg+utiGRfIODhe80EM/pycIpSzmifeewLQAMpVoIWz2TEWHr4Vaku5aJ+1JmI5dM 96vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=69uVCUkYxgw7mAuMRPRq8wjsLhrTMtfbGXDtVl28L1Q=; b=OKTYNOF5/ApW52nLQ5f7//L2Rdmfae6gbF51Lie9Gqja7BLWBmJavflU5CDDJp6Qoz UUmfFOyqUy1RSAjDTLtTC4AhVlx8iwBKovZmkZSNhVCyfB0yitKJv3h8oAAlPVBs/16l xTI7biwl0as55v3mXclHoB7ValWoNX+8zaDEHIXXYCGPQ2o+kIUps9dhT1i0tTD0cvns /j2bwlPY9cDmuGVwmDNjyoHsbWScwFcvy6buoeTFeDWZTF3AojZ3msL6Au89wRt6e+Eo XNmylQ7MUVq0WlFxukCvPR4dzZk2hVkL+3Nel7QJFXrSUq7xMgK1b5FbHectiw7hHCr9 LQXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnlXDENH7E1lcuMvPzas7w6lN9UXFGoTBq5edrFZkKxfSVHz9z1AWkoQp4cKkkPSQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.197.197 with SMTP id iw5mr4636957pac.130.1475173276215; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c66sm21931250pfd.24.2016.09.29.11.21.15 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1D30AF33624CDD4A99E8C395069A2A162AFA9F91@dfweml501-mbb>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:21:16 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4AACB05E-43F5-4CF1-B433-C0100880B3FB@gmail.com>
References: <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C39C37147@dfweml501-mbb> <DD6845A6-3B73-4C0F-9D52-1804C1DEAA56@gmail.com> <EC7A99B9A59C1B4695037EEB5036666B90DC5E@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <1D30AF33624CDD4A99E8C395069A2A162AFA9F91@dfweml501-mbb>
To: Lin Han <Lin.Han@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/0QprDzaRdZ6cH_cjfKkfBofAcKY>
Cc: "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma@huawei.com>, Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:21:23 -0000

> This sounds interesting, are you saying that the mapping system will finally support the interworking between different Loc/id protocols, such as LISP and HIP and others?
> Also, could you elaborate the "common control plane". This impressed me it will be a super-controller, isn't it?

I don’t see any reason why a HIP host cannot send LISP Map-Requests and Map-Registers to a LISP mapping system. It could do it for any EID type, even though a HIT is a perfectly fine EID key to use.

Dino

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email