[Ideas] Diasambugating Identifier and Identity

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051D5128792 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPyWC_3Yh03h for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B7D127871 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC7D623F1 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:07:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id izAlHMVsZh7V for <ideas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (dhcp-8901.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9635623F6 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:07:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: ideas@ietf.org
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <7443f8eb-181c-be31-8e80-9250b4a54e60@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:07:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/2s-BGtn9ro8PxERroNCvMEyMV_o>
Subject: [Ideas] Diasambugating Identifier and Identity
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:07:41 -0000

The Identifier/Identity definitions in 
draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-01.txt is a good start, it fails in 
the appreviations used. (There is NO abbreviation for Identity!)

ID should NOT be the appreviation of Identitfier.  People will default 
to thinking 'Identity' when they see it.  Think about people outside our 
discussion group.

I propose 'IDf' for Identifier.  'ID' is too owned by Identity.

I will be working on proposed wording to improve these definitions.