Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt

Michael Menth <menth@uni-tuebingen.de> Wed, 28 September 2016 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <menth@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42FD12B26A; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ik89pD8KvZDw; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (mx04.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.5.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4997C12B077; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (hsi-kbw-109-192-128-060.hsi6.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [109.192.128.60]) by mx04.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76977E5117; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:50:55 +0200 (CEST)
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <32C28142-350A-4242-A9C6-9E32D9966601@gmail.com> <1D30AF33624CDD4A99E8C395069A2A162A600B3E@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CA+b+ER=JhWHkDWgJhwpxUs8MWHr_yuRvqSeWgMuaJofkX_5QVg@mail.gmail.com> <8CA89FA5-D1AC-4D3B-8CB4-FD5E16DE8C4F@gmail.com>
From: Michael Menth <menth@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <57EB684E.1000601@uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:50:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8CA89FA5-D1AC-4D3B-8CB4-FD5E16DE8C4F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/9h_qu7duU_PdR3tcWZP50RdAgcc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:46:55 -0700
Cc: "beta@lispers.net" <beta@lispers.net>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org>, "lisp-alpha@external.cisco.com" <lisp-alpha@external.cisco.com>, LISPmob <users@lispmob.org>, "5gangip@ietf.org" <5gangip@ietf.org>, "lisp-ops@external.cisco.com" <lisp-ops@external.cisco.com>, Lin Han <Lin.Han@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 06:50:59 -0000

Hi Dino,

Am 28.09.2016 um 05:02 schrieb Dino Farinacci:
>> When I spoke to some of the 5G folks this was clearly the direction and in fact Dino's LISP was one of the strongest candidates there as control plane. 
> The IETF’s LISP-DDT borrows ideas from DNS but does not need to be structured like the DNS deployed today. There is hierarchy for scale with iterative lookups, but we don’t have to allow it to get out of hand with too many levels of hierarchy.
What do you mean by that exactly? What's the problem with DNS and what's
the advantage of LISP-DDT?

Michael

>
> Dino
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp