IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66036132397; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7eYx5z8eWtWP; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8641320D9; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c137so124198pga.11; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=R0qZeWh35+PlzSgueNuHravxhMj868799JQG/Ilsk2E=; b=ZlE6AfmApmq+rqaOHctDTBwjD1YX+Qz0RtV1RpPwFqOzwuVnQ7Yu9OQxEk4YI0Hjz7 jEIKjivseFXS7io1gf35r7xUzkgOUFA8K284MY70rJTrQu4WVllPLRZUyrvLVkDVgPvF pjL0pGK0EwnZYRhSENwsDIvmyNnf6IVV5/bek6L3fhclhKYCaUdrEBhfGzGT/be12aox r4VmNKYPCNsbs+9ObOTuqDdIFKXInLB4LCD/PbbLEJtKLl0u1s2aeAIHtjEzQq3dCQm6 oZ8uENYLWO3qRQMAcqHZDEyr6inj+x0xOQ5p5cCg2DeT8tHqZ/voieNGB4dt0PDFtbCQ Gjpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=R0qZeWh35+PlzSgueNuHravxhMj868799JQG/Ilsk2E=; b=UQ1u/rSbnWddPzfe6gyhczFhRUEj7b8+MK+DBk1bKQwjIGgdWENeqMmQeCUT1dw+2D g+9SL8dv3Wd+7SX2gXDsno7LnEBTo/WIqUdhVHx/TDL5wqdGQWTsKck801Pj93zryiYM GWzoHulQYF4a7An7yPaOCxZlRoM59OIqtMoaGuFjjCwiU0nl7kzwwyJmDHrq7zjBzt+7 q+gbtjvBnhRI4q1h80Xobrh715xvrUmIlmxZgdHszCc5ypeasu56hsoKlO72sJLlGZ9s WhCkKV5SzGUcAwtnz6Ev2ElqsuUO9WkIPimhSrxqA50GV1f19KW1g/saow9iaPYSNNE2 gwsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgm6gIhUdU6BrXBeGU2T8WtaDyxK9nY/wKbD5S2xWbHk8htX8s0 yeJ1jWjVf9tTXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6xxxQSrQA6k6cOEfFKTNuPs1gEkVC2+4Qxv+thi9nmYq3FZ9SQYXS71dCGYr25OuyEugB85g==
X-Received: by 10.99.109.13 with SMTP id i13mr22597072pgc.349.1505414619718; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm42846220pge.92.2017.09.14.11.43.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-evu=PU-2Baa675sqG_XcsjRvqsq=3P4V4795U8mXD+5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:43:37 -0700
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "ideas-chairs@ietf.org" <ideas-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D44B95A0-F2A6-426C-9713-688FB5237B9B@gmail.com>
References: <150490809267.17244.96544246533076816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S37_T_+6P0dhciYO7J_xTt_b_s0KYy+wdC=HngOQo8kh1g@mail.gmail.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A5ECBC@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CAKKJt-f2X674u_PtUsyjAbNAFrePaK84pcNQewdApe6a+uK=yA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36TGU2mQ54D9yZx=LFbx-GX6_1NOaqdRzyGQPwWNb79dg@mail.gmail.com> <D94FD10B-592F-49FE-A31D-461DD38E0D94@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-evu=PU-2Baa675sqG_XcsjRvqsq=3P4V4795U8mXD+5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/B4JQW4tdHe5dIadKEL33UxqN2f0>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:43:41 -0000

> You guys are thinking about the stuff I was wondering about. I'll trust that the right thing happens.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer, who has stayed as a Yes ballot through this conversation … 

From a LISP perspective, you do a mapping system lookup on some opaque key that returns a record. If the opaque key is an Identity that returns a Identifier record, so be it. And if the opaque key is an Identifier (EID) that returns a Location (RLOC) record, then so be it.

We can have the mapping system take the former lookup and return both records. So a two stage lookup can be avoided.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email