IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E627132397; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKrGEbI7ErVj; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D491320D9; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id w9so131726ywi.11; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QE1fYZLSHvxyUISxnhBUCKIrV3yx5Q80ArVeEA9vW0A=; b=LwpF2Yebptvzg4uauKYjQUM7ZyU52IX1Qj/yg59M+uwUpuIt5giX7rJgCdRJXHKAAU nHLP4hrKMW90/jnXI+sf1kI1UKy9OkgI/NAJEpexjF4vTVj7/2wEbq2NTw1Py2Rk3kqM vriHmTkUsAets0tyqMuJZgN+TuGHlcVHPv/PFU7F4Tn5gd7ksh7h3KN/el1gar8H1lvx lf+/g2qHP3v2K1NSUu6skuIxNkoSBOHVwxP7HZNL1Lp4NkLZPPzjCl7jtuKBfXZ1SzBj qDy4ksnM1V6//CoN31prkXldnhcv5q/ALkjijXE4j7UBFGGgMEnbFFu+mYTTcohcUu1o Y7oQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QE1fYZLSHvxyUISxnhBUCKIrV3yx5Q80ArVeEA9vW0A=; b=N78aop/S4x/QSZ5qNMCaCJCAzD2X8dvZgAjJHrJO9alBVoN/l7XhiXi18VUZet19Tp B8cDQ7HlRUWjzEX5Ki8TvJIHBe91GarhXPHeNHHg8ZZB5r6bAmbG9THpsQJHlvnTz9OV FSD86mKTQlzaj3I5e16JjPrk0/UbvxWNjQ47yE9th3UYVHN7MfutdFTTejt+QB0Z32w4 qOqYv5OpuoiFjPFRFFvYpGvRGBOtJyMHK2XZIW70v3iHGxjzU4/1Hp5VvjNmA/KIRvZA 4ORqrMgyOgfxQ6pk7y8OVR//J/ct5b4AuvjBLH8iQJuho0cSPNv4pIxECeMuV09i4SRJ j0og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiAWpkSqlB8EmQr/vXKa5fq5YYj6BTwt3mBA2X1BimzAVh8nFx6 PW1/51cgsBmZq3qusyPTM2s4t6b2ScTOU2v5u54=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5h+xnRMdqWhxWjWmo12jjNcINHHYrStDG9OWtyu4okjd+9DIYZtjcvCXj0Y++c/WThLH3T+lD8Cj84YWNORSs=
X-Received: by 10.13.232.7 with SMTP id r7mr19648696ywe.0.1505414440897; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.2.15 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D94FD10B-592F-49FE-A31D-461DD38E0D94@gmail.com>
References: <150490809267.17244.96544246533076816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S37_T_+6P0dhciYO7J_xTt_b_s0KYy+wdC=HngOQo8kh1g@mail.gmail.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A5ECBC@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CAKKJt-f2X674u_PtUsyjAbNAFrePaK84pcNQewdApe6a+uK=yA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36TGU2mQ54D9yZx=LFbx-GX6_1NOaqdRzyGQPwWNb79dg@mail.gmail.com> <D94FD10B-592F-49FE-A31D-461DD38E0D94@gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:40:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-evu=PU-2Baa675sqG_XcsjRvqsq=3P4V4795U8mXD+5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "ideas-chairs@ietf.org" <ideas-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c087d6afd52f105592a9c44"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/DbWdNDghnR5dq-k1ChFN-H8zZR8>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:40:43 -0000

Hi, Tom and Dino,

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > The underlying mapping system (basically specialized key/value store
> > with protocol) is common between the two use cases. However, the these
> > cases are independent in a least the sense that identifier/locator
> > protocols (as well as those for network virtualization) require
> > identifier->locator mapping but don't require any concept of identity.
> > I believe, the need for the ID/loc mapping is well understood at this
> > point, whereas the concept and rationalization for identity in this
> > area are still emerging. Both of these are valid items to pursue, but
> > I hope that a WG can minimize dependencies so that development of the
> > ID/loc mapping system does not become a long, drawn out multi-year
> > process. If this can be done in a single framework then that would be
> > okay I think.
>
> Agree 100%.
>
> Dino
>

You guys are thinking about the stuff I was wondering about. I'll trust
that the right thing happens.

Thanks,

Spencer, who has stayed as a Yes ballot through this conversation ...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email