Re: [Ideas] [nvo3] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 September 2016 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250EF12BDDE; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6sZrDp68BY3; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC7012BD09; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g67so36634195qkd.0; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3pCfiWIXhMMhZN45mfQ5eTQ8VmGehL2+S1OfjUOFgf4=; b=EKBMHtCGR/0BHlM8/9SwqzNuoZPLTDGY+wjk+VEBtC5c4iLgX9cuR0Mub2cNeOtRuW EuliE8Pn/uSfF/80uPztZNVQKikVZwwb+03qiBZpXf9vtUA7xZioovOTDzau7CxhreTZ SV/1FbGn0ao2Bo5U38Mt1nVOvwBKs7Xa5CfPoNKswzvaTvoulM3Dt76Rck7fR36k0lzH u+DTscMi7cAX7fxMaxqTdw9PdZoncJ/eH5Y4dwnD876V+FMIMckPpIU6UHKOlUY1XmNp NIYpkXqxCBnjYdyP6dSom6VJA3JlM0ZrDLHHO6aY5UJ23d8BtWwqxCCHLnmPLD8ejw8S rKLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3pCfiWIXhMMhZN45mfQ5eTQ8VmGehL2+S1OfjUOFgf4=; b=KT/XxhQ/UxYjBTeVoQu9bf1oxwaA0qWjMBD6UWq7xRp8xo2ZQqDb6x0qVYGBNBLux3 ymajTO/Q2J2gCxY0fdzwV/iYI41iPJUpzh9wXAiWYVwfhxMu8Qz6MqVcsdGwFlevdZWn 8QOFLVXG2WsYD/fcMREEjSqAp4deyLm8a4D3q01V1sxsD+zxdypKwSlj+q+su2CiHwiU tkRMF5ErfidMT0DGbCyLEHSm7CBRu+kFx2bZtBv8LvsucTsqfwJA00KhFAqUpIWOOKQI VfVYy+FIDkkDRVOFjKctSEpJUq7rhMrb+tyGe48qfMra0oqXGRf7XhAjSboQ7nDvT2uy WaRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rm7cNXFY9I3Pyf5e0U8VkcNLkPP15lLz7vzzXHluz1k+Go6rDSrcvKSu63tNwc7+qGhZrQeJUI9bzcOqg==
X-Received: by 10.55.188.193 with SMTP id m184mr5752296qkf.129.1474607838520; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.38.56 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F69ED1C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <32C28142-350A-4242-A9C6-9E32D9966601@gmail.com> <8CC1E61E-0A8F-41D3-B30D-5B037BAEDEB1@gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F69ED1C@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:17:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxoxCphOpTAUJ54u7MmCM4BBGzFR6kSyQXvvJ7B5ZZXK2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0430a665f7d2053d25e4a3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/LOvd3HKzjDWZrpc9hgvoegqVcOU>
Cc: "beta@lispers.net" <beta@lispers.net>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, LISPmob <users@lispmob.org>, "5gangip@ietf.org" <5gangip@ietf.org>, "lisp-beta@external.cisco.com" <lisp-beta@external.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [nvo3] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:17:21 -0000

Hi David

Thanks for your comments.
I take note of your comment (2) and pointer.

Here is a pointer to the draft
 https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-padma-ideas-probl
em-statement-00.txt

Padma



On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Black, David <David.Black@dell.com> wrote:

> Hi Dino,
>
> Here are a couple of areas to consider:
>
> (1) I don't see any confidentiality requirements.   For this and other
> NVO3 security
> requirements, please see the security considerations section of RFC 7365
> (NVO3
> framework) and draft-ietf-nvo3-arch.  The latter contains a new paragraph
> on
> sensitivity of performance and  other monitoring data gathered by the
> control
> plane - that paragraph was added at the behest of both Security ADs:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7365#section-5
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-arch-08#section-16
>
> (2) This item:
>
> > >   7.  Message rate-limiting and other heuristics must be part of the
> > >       foundational support of the mapping system to protect the system
> > >       from invalid overloaded conditions.
>
> suggests that congestion control is also a consideration to protect the
> network.
> If an existing congestion-controlled transport protocol (e.g., TCP, SCTP,
> DCCP) is
> not used for control traffic, then see draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis for
> discussion
> of applicable requirements:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis/
>
> Thanks, --David
>
>