IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] [5gangip] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00

Padma <padma0528@gmail.com> Tue, 20 September 2016 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <padma0528@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822AC12B436; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eM_8VVcmzxVd; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F9012B42B; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id q2so9486150pfj.3; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j0Yj+TjtUITmztdy/bsmRvfkjE/TGfEuUlEuaoRnOVc=; b=jJNI9bkrZlOXtuHwy4Pjg+vpCx6NNu2KkcnAxrmbJWDYnVXH0WbI8Pr+4EiD7lYK/j BPWwbTETP3JIIcSEgxOZrOaov3dA3aEQoTfzvTYzBRIqay+WRfX2pmLJA3mfbooZs20d XpOZ8wmirR8VHw4gn0mslRhXwbpYTufjnxd3sNV1B/bQZ93wB7xUER5HDftHhwjqgjGZ pwLL44HCveyKgtwhhAR4S6kHbCQYAepdHZedU0679KTX8TR5rBPiyW8/veCa9hNptUlz WibydzJhGPSkja421btBqAvGEJ/cnf+1XhbQqIPvjSgFo9TY6BZayf0soy3ePZRfNROZ fKAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=j0Yj+TjtUITmztdy/bsmRvfkjE/TGfEuUlEuaoRnOVc=; b=L9K5wKe21etLmaLOmgUaHlUZpXluVu0qdpXEAZg9mx5huIB1998xdN/WfasVUfxbaN e5S8wID7ajvi4N+7SwsivrxWd3AMrh95F+bCdV78hkzP0BYJGhf3ilRoGkc3l0R9ffpX 51FfBlyM2ZHHQNfa11Q3WM/rKMMgTSOM1Bnpz+IDR6TBju/NUKEPvo+ynKyy4ZdEAnyX IRS730LYk7C5ew4i4A7Ei/l4ZgHa1YQI3URMF6s9LlFUmDObGls4nBfO/z5FQAnTjgwi 8AV8QXs3tcRhNmzV+x68Ubl0tQq7pzf7F2BNWveMJDQ+s5i2cWvOyUq9dCPKKrPy3TzL pnHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOAKp7e6yzB2CcIe33EkEss2XRYK6wQLHpBPWEAhoKkWNFWb5h+O0RuUM8lClYg/A==
X-Received: by 10.98.83.130 with SMTP id h124mr57017073pfb.154.1474392715097; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.248.152.234] (mobile-166-137-179-187.mycingular.net. [166.137.179.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4sm80617349pfp.60.2016.09.20.10.31.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6B174EA6-3F44-4F9C-BF2D-86C3B4E7F1EE
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Padma <padma0528@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14A403)
In-Reply-To: <A71D4787-AFE7-4FB0-8277-6FAF62EE7D8D@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:31:52 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <2238559E-57A1-40B6-BC16-DFAA12773F29@gmail.com>
References: <AA6C2C69-3B95-4F14-B301-2B7DB83D3373@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcca1fx-Z8b-Q_Kdv9_ETgjov9RsPt+CeDN5wrC=5WoTaw@mail.gmail.com> <29FC5745-22E5-4E0E-A918-822BD30DE610@gmail.com> <029c01d21363$3d5f6e00$b81e4a00$@huitema.net> <A71D4787-AFE7-4FB0-8277-6FAF62EE7D8D@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/T4k_C4Mcmpg7j_xJNVQyaQ9-0Yo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:47:09 -0700
Cc: ideas@ietf.org, Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>, sarikaya@ieee.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, 5gangip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [5gangip] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:33:01 -0000

CC'ing ideas as well

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:27, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:15 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Note a cell phone today has so many identifiers already factory installed. 
>>> It would be a pity to not use them for identifying connections or nodes. 
>>> And an IMEI could be embedded into an IPv6 address if either LISP or 
>>> ILA is used. 
>> 
>> And that would be a terrible privacy issue, allowing anybody on the path to track movements of the device, from routers to servers, spooks and hackers. There is a reason why the IPv6 working groups 
> 
> The inner header is always encrypted and therefore obfuscated.
> 
>> deprecated the usage of MAC addresses as node identifiers, and the same reasoning applies even more to IMEI.
> 
> And guess what, they will make a come back since IoT challenged hardware doesn’t have to run IPv6-ND and suffer messaging latency.
> 
> Dino
> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email