Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9961342E2; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoqNhNawnEO2; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34A7B1342F7; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCDA621D5; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5Ho+7yIppRKY; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1108B621CD; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:52:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: ideas-chairs@ietf.org, ideas@ietf.org, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <150773363527.24819.15137383317907133805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <47ABE650-B83D-4400-B27C-C0E5F1C8BA13@gmail.com> <CABcZeBMG+OyYv1Kaeb1BeuUX_Tc3yz8TYObtv7JTVteSuY35Gg@mail.gmail.com> <F0F78529-AB1A-4B5F-B18B-FFAAF72FC5F3@gmail.com>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <398a807d-f998-8136-d0ca-24841cff4ac5@htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:52:03 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F0F78529-AB1A-4B5F-B18B-FFAAF72FC5F3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/TeE9IU3lxgU-jBi2p6t5VgrhKME>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:52:38 -0000

Just before I shut down for the week...

And I am in conversation with VC funding for IIoT that will build their 
own just like this.  Only one will put any effort into privacy because 
there is no leadship.

Dino and I are connected outside the IETF.  These groups come to us to 
talk, then go back and do their own thing to fill the void.  They will 
NOT come to the IETF, but will take what is offered.

Bob

On 10/11/2017 03:30 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> I am reaching out to the SD-WAN community. There has been huge investment from the VC community in overlay startups. They are all using proprietary control-planes. There is no interoperability among them. The IETF should not ignore this market and should help shape it.
>
> This is VXLAN-in-the-data-center market all over again making IETF working group nvo3 irrelevant.
>
> Mapping Databases ARE being deployed under the auspices of SDN-controllers. There are high profile user-groups that endorse the activity. It is not going away.
>
> IETF needs to lead and not follow.
>
> Dino
>
>
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>> (1) The work is insufficiently motivated. The claims about the need for the
>>> mapping system and the identity management system envisioned here do not appear
>>> to be backed up by those who have developed and deployed ID/LOC separation
>>> protocols. Nor do there seem to be compelling arguments that the framework that
>>> this proposed WG would produce would be the motivator for further interoperable
>>> deployments.
>> This is simply not true. The IETF mailing lists are not finding the reach of interest that exists in the industry
>>
>> Be that as it may, the determination of consensus and justification has to be made primarily on what appears on the mailing lists and at meetings.
>>
>> -Ekr
>>
>>
>> Dino
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ideas mailing list
> Ideas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas