[Ideas] Adam Roach's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 22:08 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBDE1330C1; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, ideas-chairs@ietf.org, ideas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150775968538.16711.15177859388936829449.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:08:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/WJEWjA4Kpe4nQ4_xm99FGilinME>
Subject: [Ideas] Adam Roach's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:08:05 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: Block When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ideas/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with Kathleen's evaluation and second her proposal to have additional privacy-focused discussions around the charter language prior to moving forward.