Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <> Thu, 05 October 2017 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156FF13450D; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6-8_5UGgjco; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932E513450B; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id u130so22592754oib.11; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1BTVwC+0awDKFH7VmF42ttdRvgITvWP1XFBsK4yY+Hc=; b=iAEPTF12KxGoMu/ZH0biG79jHBA3tvUOc/CnoRGKdfx26ZdAe5383OKD9zuvEG4uzq j3qAU9IkkBhmadPL1+TUdpbp885Mze3VCSQdTmqEKTNiTYNrGdp3gspOPR5w0OGSjHAw +uy+i8jB7zKSCfNUsnjqgwNWsuLFUVIVIzfg3kUrzqHkCu2uBezOo9QGnd7FhqjngSvf XAWVWYxzdQ/GuoMMlSe16SOxwHEO0ggIijcvEj57Y/trvPujv/v26azUzitlkFdcJfAB 1P6KTJy3bluwk8W24OVb84rLQjkYZxR9zBv73TRP/0Z8at8QHfveMLdFBzeLbikuqZTT XOzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1BTVwC+0awDKFH7VmF42ttdRvgITvWP1XFBsK4yY+Hc=; b=XF6pYIPye5E6J8PiPRfocJKCp2jY1leUjq/6DH8LzahDe1l0DIx7qSYBVOThBT+zsM YnVcozbkTaxrR0MzYKBuNU7JluuR6Fwz8oJxrnFOyL+6zlsu+wT9TC9zFE4ekF8LpCLC 0bB/YWEzlAuO9Zqo6BPL8JOtOf2WVED3f/2uL3YI3zKCp7Rhu3QZBB/jGado3V8yLrGS lRa9hCL8zyvreXrwqf8MSQCfmH6Ge4vAjPtPDEAvGSj57bvHCOWfWfjZcOUDgYBqXZ4s baLYlMD207P689kzo0UxHfyClk07bTODQwJt97PeD+FT1ORcwrVwV+e/VN2/47ZImmKZ tqBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUPpHiS68ZBcn+CfrTCNUcNEidr6D4R0D7mJkThfQIvhNzdTmC4 jHU9H41cpsqswrCUXRxQNwkca4x5LV5c+nYLk78=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QChd4WNd1KmcdmfAH255zWPrnnOVcOzra1UGIZHGCV9JK9ZZQq0JXkE7U2atfvClqqQhJH6tS0rySqpdq5fbV0=
X-Received: by with SMTP id d22mr8986849oic.68.1507170334000; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <94E38EAAADE89B4B40A79530@PSB> <>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 22:25:33 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tvz9eyTrA2CxH1Fy_tcV3tNl2NA
Message-ID: <>
To: Mike StJohns <>
Cc: John C Klensin <>,, IETF Discussion Mailing List <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f7b85fcdce055ac37062"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 02:25:36 -0000

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Mike StJohns <> wrote:
> FYI.  IDEAS as an IETF acronym has been taken since about 1989 or so.  It
stood for Internet Design Engineering and Analysis Series which was a
fairly short lived document series that preceded the Internet Drafts
process.  This led to at least one internet routing company noting in its
collateral that it implemented IDEA 9.
> Mike
> FWIW. I agree with John about the obnoxiousness of "" as a
mailing list name.

​ is also the name of the cipher originally used in PGP which might not be
an issue only I seem to recall it was broken with a meet in the middle
attack so it is probably tainted.