Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156FF13450D; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6-8_5UGgjco; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932E513450B; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u130so22592754oib.11; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1BTVwC+0awDKFH7VmF42ttdRvgITvWP1XFBsK4yY+Hc=; b=iAEPTF12KxGoMu/ZH0biG79jHBA3tvUOc/CnoRGKdfx26ZdAe5383OKD9zuvEG4uzq j3qAU9IkkBhmadPL1+TUdpbp885Mze3VCSQdTmqEKTNiTYNrGdp3gspOPR5w0OGSjHAw +uy+i8jB7zKSCfNUsnjqgwNWsuLFUVIVIzfg3kUrzqHkCu2uBezOo9QGnd7FhqjngSvf XAWVWYxzdQ/GuoMMlSe16SOxwHEO0ggIijcvEj57Y/trvPujv/v26azUzitlkFdcJfAB 1P6KTJy3bluwk8W24OVb84rLQjkYZxR9zBv73TRP/0Z8at8QHfveMLdFBzeLbikuqZTT XOzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1BTVwC+0awDKFH7VmF42ttdRvgITvWP1XFBsK4yY+Hc=; b=XF6pYIPye5E6J8PiPRfocJKCp2jY1leUjq/6DH8LzahDe1l0DIx7qSYBVOThBT+zsM YnVcozbkTaxrR0MzYKBuNU7JluuR6Fwz8oJxrnFOyL+6zlsu+wT9TC9zFE4ekF8LpCLC 0bB/YWEzlAuO9Zqo6BPL8JOtOf2WVED3f/2uL3YI3zKCp7Rhu3QZBB/jGado3V8yLrGS lRa9hCL8zyvreXrwqf8MSQCfmH6Ge4vAjPtPDEAvGSj57bvHCOWfWfjZcOUDgYBqXZ4s baLYlMD207P689kzo0UxHfyClk07bTODQwJt97PeD+FT1ORcwrVwV+e/VN2/47ZImmKZ tqBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUPpHiS68ZBcn+CfrTCNUcNEidr6D4R0D7mJkThfQIvhNzdTmC4 jHU9H41cpsqswrCUXRxQNwkca4x5LV5c+nYLk78=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QChd4WNd1KmcdmfAH255zWPrnnOVcOzra1UGIZHGCV9JK9ZZQq0JXkE7U2atfvClqqQhJH6tS0rySqpdq5fbV0=
X-Received: by 10.202.104.22 with SMTP id d22mr8986849oic.68.1507170334000; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.95.12 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BC106093-9C33-418F-87F1-C973E4C04009@comcast.net>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie> <94E38EAAADE89B4B40A79530@PSB> <BC106093-9C33-418F-87F1-C973E4C04009@comcast.net>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 22:25:33 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tvz9eyTrA2CxH1Fy_tcV3tNl2NA
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg2fGy+i9AnL+u6jRi5-=o2F9TV=qzN6Wps6cdN8=qJhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ideas@ietf.org, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f7b85fcdce055ac37062"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/ZFFO6t1YpRVeYHDhv6Vc2KlxmyI>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 02:25:36 -0000

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Mike StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> FYI.  IDEAS as an IETF acronym has been taken since about 1989 or so.  It
stood for Internet Design Engineering and Analysis Series which was a
fairly short lived document series that preceded the Internet Drafts
process.  This led to at least one internet routing company noting in its
collateral that it implemented IDEA 9.
>
> Mike
>
> FWIW. I agree with John about the obnoxiousness of "ideas@ietf.org" as a
mailing list name.


IDEA
​ is also the name of the cipher originally used in PGP which might not be
an issue only I seem to recall it was broken with a meet in the middle
attack so it is probably tainted.