IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B6D1326FE; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biaUOE8NxZTc; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33149126BF0; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c137so6520pga.11; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aaheTzI4FUT7gpLu7pWa3CfsPhNGPPFnFj89L6X81hY=; b=haMVItmPSO47sQuEGkdBrtAn50nCxSKESBkzHLND3XyN6DDfZZI3bTMtXH8cXAr5u9 QhaRjmDu1W3yOeEVPYPLDrsWq4LjT24CsfzxRktB3aIdHajRWcNrIZVpgwitZGncMNf3 UHA70qUEe2aDKQj7iRq2+mW38gynlDIQGzah5Wz1eJNMdOQWp02QzQyKs/14sw102sTF m7UCeKzVpVmLXhPMHptWtIUNS72bU7MQmIjFzTJ/EGKxFeyfX3Bo15jeHY40y2eneT/3 msJHpE0dvhboucNMhqRaRyu6Kb9awXzPs6PB7vrGiFYyLKGEbdnaFEeE/8/8Ey5WztFD kXbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aaheTzI4FUT7gpLu7pWa3CfsPhNGPPFnFj89L6X81hY=; b=m4nWmRMnArHU/PgaxnfYewzw0+dbEDuIp22sfMRynusVK2sHycpad/xXDFTLEHJSbY t1WOSAO7PdHJ532aq0gpYYzQOufW5dPcDzbx9OmFmBD6LV7vSXcMpAS76viySo7kBBEY BejJrYO8K4r7sotAmQFCPAjif1K64z2wK2G6FfV45Q9NV7WQA6Acn6dhJF1FC3iCIoip F4JJbvhELVJnS6hDqjM2U9/1D/eQU1mf72B/KOnAh50+EEIL9AzKNd6s5yzFD8/1gYeF tps/j+TUPrvLCwYZrg1Ch1DZ0VcdCbi/m1dVkpWQPUcZYvrkPxlDUkL6ojiCV48Irdo5 7FeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjclADdcRGYfYmq9AhfyNipK+lDb9pnf3xEGpxPbljVcAUWmXUM cul+dZZ2AwHw5gkNHo8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4xCmYcxWUmSqiy5AzBACNyPi/Pr0QO9qOcVWSSVuas7scCoKqvXleqp6z1L6Dn0jO6/+Yc+Q==
X-Received: by 10.99.104.138 with SMTP id d132mr11265351pgc.268.1505410020754; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm32021601pfk.178.2017.09.14.10.26.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36TGU2mQ54D9yZx=LFbx-GX6_1NOaqdRzyGQPwWNb79dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:27:01 -0700
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "ideas-chairs@ietf.org" <ideas-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D94FD10B-592F-49FE-A31D-461DD38E0D94@gmail.com>
References: <150490809267.17244.96544246533076816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALx6S37_T_+6P0dhciYO7J_xTt_b_s0KYy+wdC=HngOQo8kh1g@mail.gmail.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A5ECBC@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CAKKJt-f2X674u_PtUsyjAbNAFrePaK84pcNQewdApe6a+uK=yA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36TGU2mQ54D9yZx=LFbx-GX6_1NOaqdRzyGQPwWNb79dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/_RxsDWeyWDS8QcpUp4neb8bax1s>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on charter-ietf-ideas-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:27:03 -0000

> The underlying mapping system (basically specialized key/value store
> with protocol) is common between the two use cases. However, the these
> cases are independent in a least the sense that identifier/locator
> protocols (as well as those for network virtualization) require
> identifier->locator mapping but don't require any concept of identity.
> I believe, the need for the ID/loc mapping is well understood at this
> point, whereas the concept and rationalization for identity in this
> area are still emerging. Both of these are valid items to pursue, but
> I hope that a WG can minimize dependencies so that development of the
> ID/loc mapping system does not become a long, drawn out multi-year
> process. If this can be done in a single framework then that would be
> okay I think.

Agree 100%.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email