Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99D132153; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QJQSmJDVNdSr; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FDC132076; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1e2BSf-0000Td-NT; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:29:50 +0000
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:29:47 +0900
Message-ID: <m2mv4yb0r8.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Bad Ideas <ideas@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <62958257-9F18-4176-B29F-0D0D4B31E14B@netapp.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171007163002.11c897a0@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpnHKtov+pj6YFL0wxnO3YX7mbLUA9uHUkVQbHqE3A1rQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171008102541.11499408@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpEb8Lcjy0M5445K4Ob+nQW15WeEooggcxpb=hToB4HZw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171008112206.1100fa88@elandnews.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A87E81@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CALx6S342Zq15nvoxWxsAbeW=mb==QKcpOnbmEVmc_i-oEwBNRw@mail.gmail.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAA8500@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <FE455389-F6DF-44FE-85A1-BCC15CC0833E@gmail.com> <62958257-9F18-4176-B29F-0D0D4B31E14B@netapp.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/bk3-rC01IKd4r9Hx5nD5xJTVNtY>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:29:54 -0000

> The statement to take this "further in the context of a WG (hopefully
> with additional security/privacy expertise)" basically asks the rest
> of us who have no interest in this work to spend cycles on it anyway,
> in order to do damage control in a WG. The reason we do consensus
> calls on charters is so that we *don't* need to do that for ideas that
> are clearly problematic and shouldn't be chartered.

this is a terrible scaling problem.  lack of guts in the iesg devolves
into a massive time burden on a lot of people.

randy