IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 28 September 2016 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7834D12B00D; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6VA7mZ0yy22; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011B712B1F7; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id j129so53652578qkd.1; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=O0heCnjhIawhZGBDqEXqFIdA1XiPFbhWfXSYjF4M7ww=; b=wL3ZmzCWK3RXgllifCcE1LrAsZaOF3qLL+spfln/1iuzJoJu3yxwq+W/cI3rLT9iqi Kl3/NE1cEqOuBGf3f+wVID2vINCHQF1m7P+2eq6bEntKg8vzMrFSyM8sH+yczJ1sMzZd 6YtFnrxMIU7OFE8L5blXaBSb+HYGTIf6/cXgAdmSvJMuXh9Js2aGHvVNdkpmD+VJQlrQ qXZVEFrXDLpCNRxwXIi6md8T34It2YTzdPK6f4DfYeKpwWAcTxWkV0matwS/pvKXa2Pr /AU7GPTubZzwdNwkmN48jFNDQsZa75Cp9uW/Q2hnZ2g2HyDHZJ/9vvwru/X/8DhRxVv3 /wJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=O0heCnjhIawhZGBDqEXqFIdA1XiPFbhWfXSYjF4M7ww=; b=OegkJGHQuna1v+Pf3bF2AlnmV5JV+XxVZN2Yftx59RKJXuL9OOJUjRo+QAckr7sx6k mlXPtjjK4LCNvwegFjGfLCKkguQhbPX3osKoZIV5jkv2tEGXCmA5/IJ+OiaOZDr0nb5s i9vez9t4SJ3dY1to1fits3yKryITgaiiCz0jkgHqa+yGYuEzbXbGXci1p8rKuM4Uu2D4 HOy/OFWN38a1d147TrWMCfqqyV9vFVrVJBwQqihtgK2fk5fCKNY0ga5towjvIcbfD2s/ XCT1LyMu3UB6Tt4edPXgj5bCLICWXm7IMtXJ6xehTtrAe6+WN+ctCfN37KAjPNnS++r4 XWiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlNzA7Y6o72hBEcuzkKYVeTUuWKlSUhNNae9yoqlJ/fKjUeqkWoFq3nIXxSZM/NfQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.108.6 with SMTP id h6mr33527832qkc.289.1475101281201; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.1.71] (ip-64-134-222-71.public.wayport.net. [64.134.222.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z186sm4981727qkb.13.2016.09.28.15.21.20 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C39C37147@dfweml501-mbb>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:21:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DD6845A6-3B73-4C0F-9D52-1804C1DEAA56@gmail.com>
References: <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C39C37147@dfweml501-mbb>
To: Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/eabtpuaih-0Q7Em7Ip1V3ryYM5A>
Cc: "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [lisp] Mapping System Requirements and draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:21:23 -0000

> Since some efforts have been made, at least partially, in LISP, why do we still want to work on it? Appreciated if you could explain it a little bit.

LISP is a solution. The draft is a requirements document. We need to generate requirements to decide if the LISP solution meets them.

It might sound backwards, but that is how it works out chronologically.

Dino

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email