Re: [Ideas] IDEAS Charter

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 11 September 2017 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31086132969 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qlv_GaHdXpv4 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF42126B71 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6578; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505167532; x=1506377132; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=3l++qbJwcAp5t5zHxAHGTfEVcLomnERt/pSFFk3g5q8=; b=D96Yc4jssg5WT37lxroW4I55PUA92tzxQ9aL43jQRul6CeKYPxV1MRPc KxcZQFmpGUElUwyI4LB/5K/yRjDQQ5AQxaMcorm03CMudPPhGXPBHUqj7 czT6kluPFoc4Rf4Nuysv0bpnqM6FfAehHE20IE7W/1ZeLrn1X+8iVq7gQ I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A2BADhB7dZ/5NdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnBrZG4nB4NwmkSBdJBqhT+CEgojhRsCGoQJQBcBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQQBI1sLAgEIPwMCAgIwFBECBAESFIk5XAgQqwCCJyeLCQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyuCAoFQgWMrC4JyiAowgjEFmDSIQAKHWYx2knGUfgIRGQGBOAEgATaBDXcVXAGHCHaJe4EPAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,380,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217";a="291913476"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2017 22:05:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8BM5VBk030921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:05:31 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:05:31 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:05:31 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ideas] IDEAS Charter
Thread-Index: AQHTI46NpYAdbn4X/0SIIpu2u11q0qKqB18AgAZWcAA=
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:05:31 +0000
Message-ID: <C399504D-C46D-4129-B6D2-E64FC8526588@cisco.com>
References: <CAG-CQxpgzXMYQbUxPpGPL6xJD4kUeL70v5MJ8R9FbFFqnzQsug@mail.gmail.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EA9B183@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EA9B183@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C399504DC46D4129B6D2E64FC8526588ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/evKQ9X35jVGDArDTgfq3aar6N4Y>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] IDEAS Charter
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:05:34 -0000

On 9/7/17, 1:18 PM, "Ideas on behalf of Alexander Clemm" <ideas-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ideas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of alexander.clemm@huawei.com<mailto:alexander.clemm@huawei.com>> wrote:

Alex:

Hi!

> So are we an official Working Group now, or at what point
> does it become official?

As you may have noticed, I’ve started the Internal Review of the charter.  At this point the IESG and IAB review the charter and ballot [1] on it.

The IESG will discuss (and hopefully approve) the charter on Sep/28.  We then have a 2-week External Review period where the community and other SDOs can comment.   At that point we should have a WG – with plenty of time before IETF 100.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ideas/