Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Sat, 07 October 2017 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6306C134B58; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 12:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17Bv51HgzSr3; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 12:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11207134B4F; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 12:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQB80689; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 19:58:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 20:58:20 +0100
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.215]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 12:58:12 -0700
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Georgios Karagiannis <georgios.karagiannis@huawei.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
Thread-Index: AQHTPUTpHf/1VBiG/k6j1YoUSQ9obKLUrfeA//+xkRCAAI/FAIAAAIUAgAAA9AD//6NuoIAAjskAgABU/1CAAXIGgIAAHMsAgAEvZgCAAKM4gP//9tQw
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 19:58:11 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A87B1F@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie> <D7D4AEE9-3BD0-4C8F-BCC6-7185AF7D37BA@netapp.com> <9C663B18-21CC-4A16-8B26-7994B12B1DC5@piuha.net> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A872DE@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <33f100a0-5114-269c-adb4-5db6edb1fd4d@joelhalpern.com> <20171005013730.GC96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <55bf5ae5-848a-ba81-f76b-14aaefdad2bf@joelhalpern.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A873A3@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <d92f5bd7-8081-37bf-cefe-d19ba4a203e2@joelhalpern.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A8750D@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <C5034E44CD620A44971BAAEB372655DC2DD336ED@lhreml502-mbs> <b801b130-b054-6874-1d04-8cd7b8200419@cs.tcd.ie> <CAG-CQxrVsrVEcpnCcyBHHDiEM-Q-VDw0RKjtZEB+wm4hKiGqfA@mail.gmail.com> <192c25a4-c841-b828-1cfe-9e9857028b42@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <192c25a4-c841-b828-1cfe-9e9857028b42@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.245.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.59D931DE.0013, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.215, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ffc79e8c6a44093f62df7a0f42f4cdce
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/fCXHSOhH5VOQPLTib-sAwq7PlT4>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 19:58:27 -0000

	>If this effort is only aiming at some niche within the universe of devices that could have (but hopefully won't have) permanent identifiers known to networking kit

Quick response regarding the term permanent identifier:

- This is not there in the charter
- This is no more permanent than any  identity used for any AUTH method today (IETF defined)
- If this is used in any of the documents - this is to differentiate from the temporary nature of the anonymous identifiers (e.g: LISP anonymous EID). These can't be used for AUTH.
- Though it's up to the community decide which AUTH method - there was a precedent for this term - one *example* RFC 4187/5448
- would be happy to replace with any other term which indicates the intent

--
Uma C.