Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7312B132C2A; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dctTurE_yri1; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [IPv6:2620:10a:4005:8000:2306::d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFDE13202D; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,360,1503385200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="220636095"
Received: from hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.40]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2017 23:30:55 -0700
Received: from VMWEXCCAS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.20) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:01:26 -0700
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:01:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=xAl6DD7qafmnJ9x1owsF3+AnrAqO7eSOuVdzX5Fxrt4=; b=iRvfevBHUrk/TL9g7sFa48OM3scEPi4Q1Y4bXTFB5XHWVPr0d3fC+qZncxH8DEIG4tbrGACby0ZlcIidcqVy1g0t1h6a/dFJZ6a5yCutTG3f+zUwirMZdJK1W4t71RDzaz2RA8c/VLrj0QXsNn4/dpTpq87I45wUZecKMzpINlQ=
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.7; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:01:25 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.020; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:01:23 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
Thread-Index: AQHTOT35v3hyWdVoV0KqrqLEQ0bs66LZGgGSgAAfwwCAARL6Y4AABPsAgAAEGseAAXvFAIAABqOAgAA8jwCAATWVAIABAKOA
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:01:23 +0000
Message-ID: <62958257-9F18-4176-B29F-0D0D4B31E14B@netapp.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171007163002.11c897a0@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpnHKtov+pj6YFL0wxnO3YX7mbLUA9uHUkVQbHqE3A1rQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171008102541.11499408@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpEb8Lcjy0M5445K4Ob+nQW15WeEooggcxpb=hToB4HZw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171008112206.1100fa88@elandnews.com> <25B4902B1192E84696414485F572685401A87E81@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <CALx6S342Zq15nvoxWxsAbeW=mb==QKcpOnbmEVmc_i-oEwBNRw@mail.gmail.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EAA8500@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <FE455389-F6DF-44FE-85A1-BCC15CC0833E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FE455389-F6DF-44FE-85A1-BCC15CC0833E@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.7)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-originating-ip: [217.70.211.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB1764; 6:7IUzPBl5TdWxlGYsakVSVshsK9CdKaAwEWHy1q0RZK48QJjqzdgrU9hIf80RbW+Q7+L0oX/RNpHsEOPIWXpUxYjzFb7Q7H0eLhx1hphsILcynY2rXxJXGXFccU6dNEBEFO57tZik8bydn4CvEd20nUwCqy5jQskiWMEnWwp79XF8vWNk2YRyuAtqYskd6C2flhvfFrRfDiGe4M87ypjYsjygpuIa2X+F5Jvii+CsHkkPqZYsW+QmYLcVrgs4KaRX++Xr7JK+feG/SX+zs0d4sgzwqJdxNsOffIsBZO2VVrCQMEIQ1GDe+cdieT5bLSoRGi30ksRc2an1GNc64oAYeQ==; 5:z4Dh27Bhqyegz2dADxrTVtmNaXPt4IiRUDEujLnCxsHB/2Q4zXUY8kHVpoaILORVNmJYq7DTWd7eqs0IdO1RRLMMbmsknNcV6zAGQiE17jiwi7vCqAcdX4NOtSF4J9cSmTq37dMI/v+WpoUszRmv+2erb63QGzk0oUZFBcri1VU=; 24:qaBPLJ8DIfY1CRav9ewlX7HN4nq4HauHiBsIhTcqD8Li5Bxu4i+TONoSbsJqmIQESb8cWFNkSN82pbH+t6qj1a1PDqlxVJq1n+WuKQHNFFs=; 7:P29K24sLll1GWR4nZObnwL9oDjDdsOCQPpEbfDhWkJXqd5tp2qBTrgkn2vT9Taw9Xm9Zmh2J2fvFmvNJKv7+vufopVQSA2iKcOFDuz983DRQigyxzxt0Iocub427XQof3sLTNJuBYvUEQpKqI6Jw+mbpdDcZA6tpcW0TgSztrFyMDTWaZLTeS4ED2o3NheV8X9bhd5AbqKSmYkD+4iQ+Qyuys3YiFjpzc1SPLhknyv8=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 53feb44c-6189-4fd7-622c-08d51075e26e
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(2017052603199)(49563074)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB1764:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705)(100405760836317);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR06MB1764DBD18229D6EB5881CD69A74A0@BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764;
x-forefront-prvs: 0457F11EAF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(346002)(376002)(377424004)(189002)(51444003)(52314003)(199003)(24454002)(50226002)(5660300001)(6246003)(39060400002)(6916009)(2950100002)(4326008)(106356001)(105586002)(6486002)(6506006)(86362001)(77096006)(101416001)(7736002)(229853002)(189998001)(14454004)(2900100001)(82746002)(68736007)(66066001)(25786009)(36756003)(33656002)(99286003)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(53546010)(305945005)(97736004)(53936002)(6512007)(478600001)(6436002)(4001150100001)(8936002)(81166006)(93886005)(81156014)(99936001)(316002)(3660700001)(76176999)(83716003)(8676002)(2906002)(50986999)(54906003)(3280700002)(57306001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF7227E7-E378-474B-BF3B-C56A59E1D24D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Oct 2017 07:01:23.7958 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB1764
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/fjkGWfA9JM8_VeCs8KZ4tv6uack>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:01:30 -0000

Hi,

On 2017-10-10, at 17:42, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> Right after I send this e-mail I will be opening the ballot [1] for this week’s IESG Telechat discussion of this (proposed) WG.  I will be balloting “Yes” because I think that the discussion could be taken further in the context of a WG (hopefully with additional security/privacy expertise).  I know that the charter text is not perfect, and realize that I may be in the rough anyway.

not only is the charter text "not perfect", it *raises* serious security and privacy concerns.

Going forward with the current charter text is hence exactly the wrong thing to do. At the very least, the charter text requires a serious refactoring, to attempt to either address the raised concerns or to explicitly (and drastically) limit the scope of the work so that there is consensus that these issues can be worked out in a WG.

The statement to take this "further in the context of a WG (hopefully with additional security/privacy expertise)" basically asks the rest of us who have no interest in this work to spend cycles on it anyway, in order to do damage control in a WG. The reason we do consensus calls on charters is so that we *don't* need to do that for ideas that are clearly problematic and shouldn't be chartered.

Lars