Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 04 October 2017 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246C13305E; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9LJ0YM2ygj5C; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [IPv6:2620:10a:4005:8000:2306::d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF7F133039; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,478,1500966000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="219509958"
Received: from vmwexchts04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.32]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2017 11:43:24 -0700
Received: from VMWEXCCAS09-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.27) by VMWEXCHTS04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:13:20 -0700
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS09-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:13:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=KVFYSR7xAVa5XB9Q6WmKNAVjjgQErn80X124UByTaic=; b=BFwLIwgrFylBPM+NeO3padAsR+EpUdZc2tbaXU9yhOOwermjiIOER7PFb/TGBOxF7bR8fG84V1T64mgtyAc4IklG8DjpbkqYBmCV4t28Yk/D8ahIIa7VZcvD9roRT4h++DuoXtCeffUkjzkAAfFzj8zpZLxkUoEdsI6uTaXQajQ=
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.7; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:13:19 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.018; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:13:19 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
Thread-Index: AQHTOT35v3hyWdVoV0KqrqLEQ0bs66LML/QAgAfnOQA=
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:13:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D7D4AEE9-3BD0-4C8F-BCC6-7185AF7D37BA@netapp.com>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <778d5504-ba4f-d418-7b20-356353bb0fb2@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.206.82.160]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB1763; 6:D/JWnGGx9CFYYL5+dZNGqoN7KO3c1q5wrGQ91w157or5iEmXhea1pAUdNVqWrekdbm77T9GFSInJcVSgmkcdYfsI654Rs85cWEUePJwyrQAXxZg23Yl3cJe/2X03VdX57NURZdYCFtLKae8gX8pCwaP6zqZWEeiVDzC2aUMBPiVMAgaj8jpc8GaOLc2NQDHjy5cpvFAAgy42dyTqdri1/iyHQncaJS4NPQoFZbyBSp+ewwq9Ca8NYGceuIq6idDzplNPyyXwOnG5ghqPhnZ951lFokU87xDwAB634ti104r57r2/jvqfCyGs/g3a2N6IDXvQDqHzpP0gpFotvxl+bw==; 5:SBrHgl6WikL1dtIKTaP7m1yJq4S1yhqtD9kdifXUBqKc/Zj5PMMdGEtY0bTusM9jK42vAYoBxh+9jyXnIjUriF6YAkI9yYhjKUAZlOQMfTr9wH/w6onLLVlkY/bc1Dokq3LfTPmGJ+r9dxi8Cs8qOA==; 24:hIUkO3r3YIiO6eUKgiqLhHyfxBPxq05+YcH5aNY27lMfYN5+4dNqAY6ZfTlKFlT5vASdy8QnjTKerVKE/OtI+IoAURQRUSgWPPEHqEafYaI=; 7:0X3PPG5fTd2bJKQiZeVsqtoJiaIl53WSu66k2yvPwfuQw42Kzai0K8a85daI+3fG1LjoaszEjtfGjEarfCpNrRJqG2iRlCIFKZwdPIqzrjU7yTBeH8TbxmU1nJ4XOB9XYW63LgJEe575aTuVDGLzUycEmhJzJlydpgZPPDpqiaJgS2awCl+sCj3qHKmuixbY+F8A66RyGPWCPG6wqjG8kCywWpbdAa1iQ1Vvl2sgp+I=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ea7cb18b-1bc0-4711-da8d-08d50b5bf913
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(2017052603199)(49563074)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1763;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB1763:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(32856632585715);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR06MB176353ED963C465B9F8B430FA7730@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1763; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1763;
x-forefront-prvs: 0450A714CB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(346002)(376002)(199003)(24454002)(377424004)(189002)(81156014)(6512007)(66066001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(2900100001)(68736007)(8676002)(81166006)(101416001)(6246003)(97736004)(99286003)(86362001)(2950100002)(14454004)(53936002)(106356001)(4001150100001)(6916009)(105586002)(57306001)(54906003)(36756003)(50226002)(6436002)(8936002)(4326008)(3846002)(5660300001)(305945005)(316002)(6116002)(77096006)(2906002)(478600001)(25786009)(53546010)(189998001)(50986999)(6506006)(6486002)(76176999)(99936001)(83716003)(33656002)(229853002)(7736002)(102836003)(82746002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB1763; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3734A9B8-62A1-488F-A55A-C928BD4C2588"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Oct 2017 19:13:18.8894 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB1763
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/kbfBOdtn5SZCbMww9YUTkdzJpEk>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:13:22 -0000

On 2017-9-29, at 11:31, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> As currently described, I oppose creation of this working
> group

+1, for the reasons below

Lars

> on the basis that it enables and seemingly encourages
> embedding identifiers for humans as addresses. Doing so
> would have significant privacy downsides, would enable
> new methods for censorship and discrimination, and could
> be very hard to mitigate should one wish to help protect
> people's privacy, as I think is current IETF policy.
> 
> If the work precluded the use of any identifiers that
> strongly map to humans then I'd be ok with it being done
> as it'd then only be a waste of resources. But I don't
> know how that could be enforced so I think it'd be better
> to just not do this work at all.