Re: [Ideas] Fwd: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Mon, 02 October 2017 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A54B132396 for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UinmSDHylStr for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CC3120720 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp06.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.232]) by mx42.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1dz3uI-00026w-Rq for ideas@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:49:35 +0200
Received: from [10.5.2.35] (helo=xmail10.myhosting.com) by xsmtp06.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1dz3u2-0003NP-Aj for ideas@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:49:10 -0400
Received: (qmail 1740 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2017 16:48:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.103]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.56.42.117]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail10.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ideas@ietf.org>; 2 Oct 2017 16:48:29 -0000
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>
References: <e476f817-580b-9083-48bb-72de1745f1c1@huitema.net> <67067a23-bb7f-08e4-3766-8802d8f3121f@huitema.net> <45e8993a73ef4bb9b3914f32c4609823@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CALx6S35GKkW1GzSDA2qPx9SJWUfGE23SC4gct3H7eg=EUixgCA@mail.gmail.com> <3a9cf74ba67d4222b1c543d8bfccfe20@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <a456a012-8baf-0c24-de1c-90f0a17b4f67@huitema.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:48:27 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a9cf74ba67d4222b1c543d8bfccfe20@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------02DD9E115AC82A4349A1B272"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.232
X-SpamExperts-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.07)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5nnRH5OCGIekfan419MO3gcXv9krsgRhBn0ayn6qsUc7p7He3a39gjg/ 9oOEoAajC61PdOWeIW8R8TgUu5HhPnLUSYGqqhr6VpiMkB5EEtKpTGulXfuaNr1V9B1E4+3dI3nk BRYAruZ5hO/GfxnCDKeLTZrohEYNqXHUJBt/zvJojj0HlFDoqoWF20+xKQ35+qr5V2ZbZ4HnGWDW DCGQER28QWdnB3wN1Us5flF/yXto+m6tTHY+01PY0Fa/G3bd5Npo8E55I3oL4X/9gaBZfvr6VL1B tSX2x7FdoqxZLLNInsq4c1pop2DuIERl592w1UzGVaY28QIxbnHhmVmUg//xFvReUB/vUq9cRUSN fRacYvJxnE2uvPYPCbpmnXes/ii2IAbWxB6xZ+NuqELn3pmRVYKU9W9tbmVXJBqdHHDm4W04ooUi IegHnDOOrq+/aMk+XoreKQ2SPH1UIIzo7c3u+aEdm3+zO5teKLXRbOgM+rOrdJaBYvX2Vr0DqPfo IkQ9v4Phn+YN6RP23kGBELrCNsbRg//mN0jF8dSqZiN4x6JvzKixj8PC+OqalCFkmpH+vpUDIZeJ XjrpEEsmd+8wbu9lcViFVxDhGp2PwufGcyNBJprCgmabT8JgPqpM5rXFXkQEnTC9rKm30SFEfAwT 3HfqasSOvpJDggeXzOMEFplgxXXijguesMtH2okR9lz1pRXWhjh9fdbl44I0Df0tN9eq0V0hlrWD EiOHLhiBnVLUE5wQMuDWRk3qAUSk9R3h1vgDbEdmhrg3iVBpdRa29tyIytZRvp0Gut3t97wmGpIO PepTCxFMvIavjx/iA3YOJbgNLT0Ix6mdJEErnNhWBb39uS1TjWG2Inx+Ts2QvrhVVD6SNHfaCiIW OOQAkvVDEoFOK6EAWKQ3WFIxRUtYANHDTJAVnZcGvok0a1Vj
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/mB2STFF8BWx350bPhpvc4HSzBWw>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Fwd: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:49:48 -0000

On 10/2/2017 9:30 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:

> >If the good guys are able to track mobile devices based on plain text
> address, doesn't that
>
> > mean the bad guys will be able to do that also? Seems a little bit
> scary prospect to me in
>
> > the context of aviation...
>
>  
>
> There are no bad guys in this network. The underlay network is secured
> against
>
> unauthorized access.
>

Fred, that's the kind of statements that really give me pause. "Let's do
something dangerous on my network because it is well isolated and
secure." I am pretty sure that the gentle folks at Equifax were thinking
along similar lines.

-- 
Christian Huitema