IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] [5gangip] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00

<Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de> Thu, 22 September 2016 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6AE12BD0C; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7WtF7aak615; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B0012B4CC; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from q4de8psa169.blf.telekom.de ([10.151.13.200]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 22 Sep 2016 18:28:26 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,379,1470693600"; d="scan'208";a="1151870864"
Received: from he105831.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.169.119.34]) by q4de8psazkj.blf.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 22 Sep 2016 18:28:26 +0200
Received: from HE105831.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.34) by HE105831.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.169.119.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:28:26 +0200
Received: from HE105831.EMEA1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::68a7:ffa4:81be:3178]) by HE105831.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::68a7:ffa4:81be:3178%26]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:28:26 +0200
From: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
To: <farinacci@gmail.com>, <dlake@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [5gangip] [Ideas] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00
Thread-Index: AQHSFEsJuRQii2yHhECr7124bUPZyaCFrjyg
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:28:26 +0000
Message-ID: <b8b57fc663874d53a7a913cceb994ea2@HE105831.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <AA6C2C69-3B95-4F14-B301-2B7DB83D3373@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcca1fx-Z8b-Q_Kdv9_ETgjov9RsPt+CeDN5wrC=5WoTaw@mail.gmail.com> <29FC5745-22E5-4E0E-A918-822BD30DE610@gmail.com> <7cc516e0-b966-5ed0-55ed-f6e31ec90753@htt-consult.com> <CAD6AjGQqq2Y7a7GkRyxJbaQU+1D1+BNqQjhxDudr=rppvjzKOQ@mail.gmail.com> <BB0E6438-E1F4-4D46-AA71-BC5EAE009433@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSF80EMy4fDv8CSGmVMXN2+j+V=q-o8RCVos_Lzx1RiJQ@mail.gmail.com> <b776ff07cf9e4007b75acdfa2f26a2a0@XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com> <0BD593BB-4E8E-4A0A-A961-42BD73288AC5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0BD593BB-4E8E-4A0A-A961-42BD73288AC5@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.17.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/t-9QeD5QUiduD7JG5LWRrqQuugY>
Cc: 5gangip@ietf.org, ideas@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ideas] [5gangip] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:28:58 -0000

Dear all,
Maybe your remark, Dino, on 'more than mobility and overarching connectivity' .... to be solved on - I would say: network - level ... is a good chance to remind of the original attempt of 5G-related discussion: to agree on a concrete work plan (see minutes of Berlin side meeting at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/KL8oIichqzDjJyfyKSa8255wQP8)  - i.e. set of requirements, problem and solution space analysis ...

May we solicit volunteers to write drafts on that - so we can hope we have a chance at next IETF to go a step further towards scoping the needed work!? 

Thanks a lot!  

Best Regards
Behcet and Dirk 

-----Original Message-----
From: 5gangip [mailto:5gangip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 22:59
To: David Lake (dlake)
Cc: 5gangip@ietf.org; ideas@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [5gangip] [Ideas] Comments to draft-vonhugo-5gangip-ip-issues-00

> We need to abstract the human communication piece from the underlying network substrate(s).

And note, mobility just isn’t a feature in 5G. We want to roam within 5G, within WiFi, and across each technology. And there is BT, BLE, and LTE-NB coming. Just to name a few.

Right now the applications don’t help us out here (and they shouldn’t, this is a lower level problem). And, as David says, we humans have to “Tap on Settings, click Wifi, turn it off to use LTE, etc. 

Can you believe in the year 2016, we as users have to do this!

Dino

_______________________________________________
5gangip mailing list
5gangip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email