Re: Suggested extension

Mike StJohns <stjohns@umd5.umd.edu> Tue, 01 December 1992 00:28 UTC

Message-Id: <9212010028.AA24132@umd5.umd.edu>
To: James M Galvin <galvin@tis.com>
Cc: Peter Eriksson <pen@lysator.liu.se>, ident@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Suggested extension
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 30 Nov 92 16:20:03 -0500. <9211302120.AA05848@TIS.COM>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1992 19:28:54 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike StJohns <stjohns@umd5.umd.edu>

Yup - your chair is ruling this out of order for this go around.  

Status - the IESG is waiting on me to make some minor edits (in my
copious free time) before sending the thing forward.  There was a
brief meeting at the IETF and literally no one came -- well no one who
had read any of the document.  I'm also on the hook to provide
minutes.  

Later, Mike

WRT changes - one thing I noted was how non-backwards compatible the
two changes proposed were.  You might want to try re-working them --
or better yet, junk the current protocol and use something that's
binary or based on ASN.1 and can be designed to be expandable.  Or
even better, use the MIB.

Mike

Suggested extension Peter Eriksson
Re: Suggested extension Peter Eriksson
Re: Suggested extension James M Galvin
Re: Suggested extension Peter Eriksson
Re: Suggested extension Mike StJohns
Re: Suggested extension Peter Eriksson
Re: Suggested extension Ned Freed
Re: Suggested extension Peter Eriksson